tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17936699469065079762024-03-03T20:51:31.959-08:00George KooGeorgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.comBlogger557125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-31742860248532350692024-03-03T20:50:00.000-08:002024-03-03T20:50:43.824-08:00美國自動導航進入自毀之途Published in SingTao Daily <a href="" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="https://www.singtaousa.com/2024-02-29/美國自動導航進入自毀之途%EF%BC%88下%EF%BC%89/4777055" target="_blank">here</a>.
在聯邦參議院最近的一次聽證會上,來自阿肯色州的參議員科頓(Tom Cotton)顯然很難理解,一個新加坡公民可以長得像中國人,說話像中國人,但卻不是中國共產黨黨員。在科頓對TikTok執行長周受資(Chew Shou Zi)的質詢中,他甚至連周受資的妻兒是美國公民都懷疑。
對於科頓和其參議員同僚來說,這一切都是很嚴肅的事,因為他們是以保護美國國家安全、抵禦迫在眉睫的中國威脅的名義進行調查的。顯然,科頓在哈佛接受的教育並沒有告訴他,新加坡距離北京數千公里,是一個獨立於中國的主權國家,抑或他只是在嘩眾取寵,迎合選民的低級趣味。
大約在同一時間,《南華早報》報道說,中國科學家研製出了一種「改變遊戲規則的電子戰軍事監控設備」。該報稱,實際上,他們的突破將使中國人民解放軍能夠實時發現並精確定位軍事目標,令其無處藏身。
這是中國在軍事武器領域取得的一系列技術進步中的最新進展,表明中國在武器研發方面已經趕超美國。其他技術進步包括高超音速導彈、隱形戰鬥機和無人機、航母上的先進發射系統,以及建造比美國多得多的海軍艦艇的能力。
當美國忙於從每個床底下搜捕「全中國」的間諜時,中國一直在投資硬件和軟件開發,以消除美國的軍事優勢。
每一次,當中國研發出可以對抗美國先進武器的武器時,只會助長美國對中國威脅的偏執,使五角大樓的侏儒們爭先恐後地申請更多預算撥款來研發下一代殺人機器。這樣,你壓我一頭,我壓你一頭,惡性循環下去。
華盛頓的戰略規劃者們也非常擅長根據「假如我是中國人」的預測來構造可能的情景。五角大樓的一些將軍推測,解放軍將在2027年做好入侵台灣的準備。突然之間,大陸的入侵意圖變成了事實,警鐘長鳴,備戰開始。
將中國描繪成威脅於業務有利
當然,將中國描繪成一個來勢洶洶的威脅有利於美國的保護業務。任何認為中國是威脅的國家都會成為美國安全保護的客戶。美國在全球擁有800多個軍事基地,擁有這些基地需要理由。
另一方面,世界正在清醒地認識到,中國不會對任何人構成威脅。中國促成了沙特和伊朗間的和平協議,並與150個國家建立了「一帶一路」倡議。北京在中國境外沒有任何軍事存在,除了在吉布提(Djibouti)有一個補給基地,而且它堅持不干涉他國內政。
據傳,就連美國也要求中國代表美國與伊朗和也門胡塞武裝交涉。胡塞武裝一直在紅海向美國和以色列的航運發射導彈,迫使船隻繞道非洲之角,而不是通過蘇伊士運河,造成了嚴重的經濟混亂。
儘管美國在世界各地都有基地,但強大的美國軍隊對也門的胡塞叛軍幾乎束手無策,對伊朗也毫無影響力。胡塞武裝同情加沙的巴勒斯坦人,與美國人對著幹,贏得了全世界的聲望和認可。中國無法向美國提供任何補救措施,只能要求拜登總統說服以色列立即停火。
當小島國瑙魯與台灣斷交承認中華人民共和國時,美國國務卿布林肯飛往南太平洋訪問其他島國,要求他們守住底線,不要轉變外交關係。作為回報,他承諾向這些國家的政府提供數十億美元的幫助。
「白人不可信」
布林肯來了又走了,華盛頓並沒有隨之提供資金。帕勞和馬紹爾群島的首腦不耐煩了,寫信給華盛頓,先是私下溝通,然後是公開信,告訴全世界,美國人的名譽並不值錢。
此時此刻,世界看到的是昔日的霸主在一幫烏合之眾面前束手無策,在阻止以色列在加沙的種族滅絕行動方面毫無希望,向小島國開出無法兌現的空頭支票。
時任總統特朗普試圖「讓美國再次偉大」,開始美國與中國的經濟競爭,拜登上台後繼續加劇,現在又如何呢?
首先,特朗普聲稱對從中國進口的商品徵收關稅是美國財政部可「免費」獲得的資金,這對於任何學過「經濟學101」基礎課的人來說,都是可笑的。然而拜登卻繼續執行關稅政策,因為他害怕得罪那些愚蠢到相信特朗普「免費」政策的美國選民。(進口關稅實際上損害了納稅人的錢袋子解釋起來要困難得多)。
拜登還加倍努力,提供激勵措施讓製造業回歸美國,或至少將製造業從中國「近岸化」到更友好的國家。值得稱讚的是,美國的製造業得到了適度的回流,這些製造業可以高度自動化,而且不依賴於在美國已經找不到的熟練生產工人。
確實,相當一部分低價值商品的製造業確實離開了中國,其中一個熱門目的地就是越南。越南人的職業道德與中國不相上下,因此取得了一定程度的成功。但這些業務依賴於在中國建立起來的供應鏈,事實上,許多業務實際上由遷往越南的中國公司所擁有。
最近的貿易數據顯示,雖然中國對美國的直接出口有所下降,但對越南和墨西哥的出口卻大幅增長,與後者對美國出口的增長同步。換句話說,供應鏈延長,效率降低,是對美國貿易政策的直接反應。
中國的電動汽車生產正在風靡全球,超越日本、德國和韓國,成為世界第一大汽車出口國。為了阻止中國電動汽車進入美國市場,拜登對其加徵了25%的進口關稅。中國的回答是在墨西哥建立組裝廠。
由於種種原因,拜登的半導體製造業回歸戰略也令人大跌眼鏡。
台積電(TSMC)在屈服於美國的壓力,將一條先進的生產線遷往亞利桑那州鳳凰城時發現,建造和運營這家技術難度極高的工廠所需的熟練工人十分缺乏。首條生產線的投產日期至少推遲了一年。
台積電曾獲承諾搬遷工廠將獲得數十億元的補貼,但它仍在等待這筆錢。與此同時,美國土生土長的英特爾公司將在美國建造一座不那麼先進的新晶圓廠,並預計可及時獲得數十億元的補貼。如果台積電被拋棄,沒有人會感到意外。
中國的「崩潰」未成現實
主流媒體的專家們目睹中國大型房地產控股公司近期破產時,高興地大笑起來。他們推斷並預測中國經濟將再次出現負增長,甚至全面崩潰。
然而,位於瑞士的經濟政策研究中心今年發表的一篇論文宣稱:「中國現在是世界上唯一的製造業超級大國。其工業產值超過其後9個製造業大國的總和」,是美國的三倍,日本的六倍。
作為世界製造業超級大國,中國在製造戰爭武器和工業產品方面能夠輕鬆超越美國也就不足為奇了。
如果西方觀察家不是忙於貶低中國的努力,將中國的進步歸咎於知識產權盜竊和山寨,他們也許會意識到,中國在電動汽車、造船、基礎設施建設和高鐵發展方面佔據主導地位是不可避免的,因為中國順應了巨大且不斷增長的國內市場的需求。
另一個與中國競爭的對策是拜登政府對中國的高科技實施制裁和出口限制,特別是限制半導體技術和人工智能(AI)晶片。
根據美國之前與俄羅斯打交道的經驗,經濟制裁和禁運適得其反,極大地促進了俄羅斯對非與美國結盟世界的出口,使盧布升值至新高。
事實上,去年9月,華為推出了一款功能可與蘋果最新款iPhone媲美的智能手機,該手機採用了華為自研晶片設計,由中國境內的中芯國際(SMIC)工廠製造,令美國大吃一驚。三年來,華為一直被禁止使用台積電的晶圓廠服務,但它找到了繞過限制的辦法。
有決心就有出路
想方設法繞過美國的制裁和禁運是不可避免的,也是遲早的事。
中國的人口是美國的四倍,每年產生的科學、技術、工程和數學(STEM)畢業生是美國的六倍,中產階級消費市場比美國總人口還要大。
中國的工業產能是美國的三倍,勞動力的技術水平也與時俱進,為甚麼美國要對在經濟上被中國趕超憤憤不平呢?
與此同時,除了爭論在南部邊境修牆阻擋非法移民之外,我還沒有看到美國在重建基礎設施方面取得多少成就。讓人哭笑不得的是,今年年初看到的唯一一則報道是修復了橫跨紐約東河的漢密爾頓大橋。
這實際上是在2013年,由位於附近新澤西州的一家中國建築公司在美中友好時期完成的。
美國發往烏克蘭的彈藥已經告罄,而紅海邊的胡塞武裝也煩得要命,就像打不死的小強。華盛頓要說服台北政府挑釁台灣海峽對岸的巨龍,運氣不會太好,而且在全世界的威望也在日漸低落。
《亞洲時報》的戈德曼(David Goldman)寫道:「從blob(外交精英小集團)手中拯救美國的未來」。在我看來,「blob」是一個更形象的說法,指的是在華盛頓發瘋的新保守派以保護國家安全為名在世界各地製造緊張局勢。他們製造的緊張局勢越多,軍工企業拿到的下一代武器訂單就越多。
美國人通過增加國債和印製更多鈔票來為武器買單。總有一天世界上所有人都會認識到美元正在穩步貶值,並決定不再持有。面對可疑的信仰和可信的衰落,美國將陷入掙扎。
戈德曼的結論是:「我們無法阻止中國的崛起,但我們可以崛起得更快」。哇,我們可以嗎?
撥款5億元抨擊中國
這個月我看到國會撥款5億元用於「對中國的負面新聞報道」。我想,阻止崛起的一個辦法就是把每一次崛起都變成中國崩潰的故事。我們是世界上最強大的宣傳機器,我們可以(而且已經)把每一個故事都描繪成與事實恰恰相反的樣子。
讓7億多人擺脫貧困可以被報道為人權暴行。對維吾爾族青年進行再教育,引導他們遠離恐怖主義,可以被視為奴役。普洛西認為,香港抗議者暴力破壞財產、殺害無辜旁觀者的行為可以被描述為「美麗的」爭取民主和自由的鬥爭。
自遮雙目入群峰,就是美國的取道方式。Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-28840456110684169932024-02-29T20:34:00.000-08:002024-03-03T20:42:46.351-08:00America on autopilot to self-inflicted destructionFirat posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2024/02/america-on-autopilot-to-self-inflicted-destruction/" target="_blank">Asia Times</a>.
At a recent hearing in the US Senate, Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas apparently had trouble understanding that a citizen of Singapore can look like a Chinese, talk like a Chinese and yet not be a member of the Communist Party of China. In Cotton’s questioning of Chew Shou Zi, the chief executive of TikTok, even the fact that Chew’s wife and children are American citizens seemed suspicious to him.
This was all serious stuff for Cotton and his fellow senators as they probed in the name of safeguarding America’s national security against the looming threat of China. Apparently, Cotton’s Harvard education did not tell him that Singapore is thousands of kilometers from Beijing and is a sovereign nation independent of China. Or maybe he was just grandstanding to cater to the lowbrow mindset of his constituents.
At around the same time, the South China Morning Post reported that Chinese scientists had developed a “game-changing military surveillance device for electronic warfare.” In effect, the paper said, their breakthrough will enable the People’s Liberation Army to find and pinpoint the quadrants of a military target in real time with no place to hide.
This is the latest of a series of technological advances China has made in military arms that indicate it has either caught up with or surpassed the US in weapons development. Others include hypersonic missiles, stealth fighters and drones, advanced launch system on aircraft carriers, and the capacity to build many more naval vessels than the US.
While the US has been busy hunting for spies from the “whole of China” under every bed, China has been investing in hardware and software developments to neutralize American military superiority.
Each time, as China develops a counter to America’s advanced weaponry, this simply feeds US paranoia about China’s threat and causes the Pentagon gnomes to go scurrying for more budget allocations to develop the next-generation killing machine. Thus, you top me and then I will top you for topping me, and the vicious circle goes on.
The strategists and planners in Washington are also very good at creating likely scenarios based on the projection of what the Chinese would do “if I were them.” Some Pentagon generals speculate that the PLA will be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Suddenly, the mainland’s intent to invade becomes fact, and alarm bells ring and war preparations are begun.
Portraying China as a menace is good for business
Of course, positioning China as a menacing threat is good for America’s protection business. Any country that believes in China as a threat becomes a client of the US security protection. The US has more than 800 military bases around the world and needs reasons for having them.
On the other hand, the world is awakening to the realization that China is not posing a threat to anyone. It brokered a peace agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran and has have established its Belt and Road Initiative with 150 countries. Beijing does not have any military presence outside of China to speak of, unless you count a supply base in Djibouti, and it adheres to non-interference in other countries’ domestic affairs.
Even the US is rumored to have asked China to intercede on America’s behalf with Iran and the Houthis in Yemen. The Houthis have been firing missiles at American and Israeli shipping in the Red Sea, forcing the rerouting of ships around the Horn of Africa instead of going through the Suez Canal, causing significant economic disruption.
Despite its bases around the world, the mighty American military is virtually helpless against the Houthi rebels of Yemen and has no influence on Iran. The Houthis, by taking on the Americans in sympathy with the Gaza Palestinians, have gained worldwide prestige and recognition. China was unable to offer the US any remedy other than that President Joe Biden must persuade Israel to enact an immediate ceasefire.
When the tiny island nation of Nauru switched diplomatic relations from Republic of China (aka Taiwan) to the People’s Republic of China, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken flew to visit other island states in the South Pacific asking them to hold the line and not switch their diplomatic ties. In return, he promised billions of dollars to help out the governments.
‘White man can’t be trusted’
Blinken came and left, and no money followed from Washington. The heads of Palau and the Marshall Islands got impatient and wrote to Washington, first in the form of a private communication and then by public letter telling the world that the American word of honor isn’t worth very much.
At this point, the world sees the heretofore hegemon helpless before a ragtag band of rebels, hopeless in being able to stop Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza, and offering checks to tiny island nations that can’t be cashed.
What about the US economic competition with China begun by then-president Donald Trump as he tried to “make America great again,” which was continued and even accentuated by his successor, President Joe Biden?
First of all, Trump’s assertion that tariffs imposed on imports from China were “free” money for the US Treasury is, to anyone that took Economics 101, as ludicrous as it sounds. Yet Biden continued the tariff policy because he was afraid of offending those American voters dumb enough to believe in Trump’s free money. (Explaining that import tariffs actually hurt the taxpayer’s pocketbook is much more challenging.)
Biden also doubled down by providing incentives to bring back manufacturing to the US, or at least “nearshoring” it out of China to friendlier countries. To his credit, the US enjoyed a modest return of manufacturing that can be highly automated and does not depend on skilled production workers who are no longer found in America.
Indeed, a good portion of manufacturing of low-value goods did leave China, a popular destination being Vietnam. The work ethic of the Vietnamese is comparable to that in China and thus enjoyed some degree of success. But these operations depend on the supply chains well established in China, and many, in fact, are actually owned by Chinese companies that relocated to Vietnam.
Recent trade data show that while China’s direct export to the US has declined, its export to Vietnam and Mexico has significantly increased, in step with the latter increase in exports to the US. In other words, the supply chain lengthened, and became less efficient in direct response to American trade policy.
China’s production of electric vehicles is taking over the world by storm, becoming the No 1 exporter of cars, having surpassed Japan, Germany and South Korea. To keep Chinese EVs from the American market, Biden has added a 25% import tariff on them. China’s answer is to build an assembly plant in Mexico.
Biden’s strategy to bring back semiconductor manufacturing has also been significantly underwhelming, for a number of reasons.
As Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) discovered, when it acceded to US pressure and moved an advanced production line to Phoenix, Arizona, the skilled workers needed to build and run the technologically challenging plant were lacking. The startup date for the inaugural operation has been pushed back by at least a year.
TSMC was promised billions of dollars in subsidy for the relocated fab and it is still waiting for the money. Meanwhile, American born and bred Intel, with a much less advanced new fab to be built in the US, is slated to get its billions in a timely manner. The likelihood of TSMC being left holding the bag should surprise no one.
China’s ‘collapse’ contrary to reality
Pundits in the mainstream media chortled in delight as they witnessed the recent bankruptcy of China’s major real-estate holding companies. They extrapolated and predicted negative growth for China’s economy, even a total collapse – again. See, for instance, a particularly incisive dissection of such buffoonery.
Yet a paper published this year by the Switzerland-based Center for Economic Policy Research declared that “China is now the world’s sole manufacturing superpower. Its industrial production exceeds that of the nine next largest manufacturers combined,” three times as big as the US and six times as big as Japan.
As the world’s manufacturing superpower, it’s no wonder that China can easily surpass the US in the making of weapons of war as well as industrial goods.
If Western observers hadn’t been so busy belittling China’s efforts, attributing progress to IP theft and copycat, they might have realized that China’s dominance in EVs, ship building, infrastructure building and high-speed train development were inevitable, as China responded to demands of a huge and growing domestic market.
Another response to competing with China is for the Biden White House to impose sanctions and export restrictions on high technology to China, in particular restrictions on access to semiconductor technology and chips for artificial intelligence.
Based on America’s prior experience with Russia, wherein economic sanctions and embargoes backfired and gave Russia a great boost in export to the world not aligned with the US and strengthened the value of ruble to new highs, Biden surely should have considered that China is too big for any effective stranglehold.
Indeed, last September Huawei surprised the US by introducing a smartphone that rivaled the latest Apple iPhone in function using its own chip design and made by a Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC) fab inside China. Huawei was denied access to the fab services of TSMC for three years but found a way around the restrictions.
Where there’s a will, there’s a way around
Finding ways around American sanctions and embargoes is inevitable and a matter of time.
China has a population four times that of the US, generates six times as many science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) graduates every year, and has a middle-class consumer market larger than the total population of the US.
With industrial capability three times that of the US and a workforce that is technologically up to date, why should America resent being surpassed economically?
In the meantime, other than arguing about building the wall on the southern border to keep out the illegal immigrants, I haven’t seen much accomplished in rebuilding the infrastructure in America. Laughing out loud, the only story I saw reported early this year was the restoration of the Hamilton Bridge across the East River in New York City.
This was actually completed in 2013 and done by a Chinese construction company based in nearby New Jersey during friendlier times.
The US is running out of munitions to send to Ukraine, and the Houthis by the Red Sea are annoying as hell, like a gnat that couldn’t be swatted. Washington is not going to have much luck persuading the Taipei government to provoke the dragon across the Taiwan Strait, and is facing diminishing prestige around the world by the day.
Asia Times’ David Goldman writes about “Saving America’s future from the blob.” I see the “blob” as a more graphic term for the neocons running amok in Washington raising tensions everywhere in the world in the name of protecting national security. The more tension they caused, the more orders for next generation weapons are placed with the military industrial complex.
Americans pay for the weapons by raising the national debt and printing more money. The day will come when everybody in the world recognizes the steadily declining value of the dollar and decides not to hold on to the greenback any more. Backed by the dubious full faith and credit of a fading America, the US will be in a world of hurt.
Goldman concludes that “we cannot stop the rise of China, but we can rise faster.” Wow, we can?
$500 million for China-bashing
What I have seen this month is a congressional allocation of $500 million for “negative news coverage of China.” I guess one way to stop the rise is to turn every rise into a story of China’s collapse. We are the most powerful propaganda machine in the world and we can (and have) portray every story just opposite to what is actually true.
Taking more than 700 million people out of poverty can be reported as human-rights atrocity. Re-education of Uighur young people to steer them away for terrorism can be seen as slave labor. The violent destruction of property and killing of innocent bystanders by Hong Kong protesters can be described, according to Nancy Pelosi, as a “beautiful” fight for democracy and freedom.
Pulling the wool over its own eyes is how America will fly into a mountain waiting in its flightpath.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-24354071005930295432023-11-14T10:34:00.000-08:002023-11-14T10:34:34.087-08:00隱形的原因顧屏山 矽谷
Sing Tao Daily, November 11, 2023
一位好久不見的舊識邀請我們參加周四晚上史丹佛大學紀錄片《隱形國家》(Invisible Nation)放映活動。這是一個與老友重聚並享用主辦者承諾的免費便餐的機會。可是,當我們到達時卻發現,所有的便當都拿光了。這是一系列令人失望的事情中的首樁。
《隱形國家》被宣傳為一部關於台灣的紀錄片,已開始在美國各地放映。按照新聞業的傳統標準,紀錄片應該透過呈現純粹的事實來提供資訊和教育,並讓觀眾得出自己的結論。「隱形」的片名使該紀錄片成為笑柄,它對蔡英文進行毫不掩飾的崇拜,也對台灣作為民主典範全面認可。
《隱形國家》充滿了缺陷,主要是對歷史和個人資訊的故意遺漏。
這部影片描繪從荷蘭殖民這座島嶼開始的台灣歷史,並聲稱唯一由一個政府同時控制大陸和台灣是在1945年至1949年。二戰結束後,蔣介石和收復台灣的國民黨短暫地統治台灣,蔣介石被迫從大陸逃到台灣。這往好處說是具誤導性,往壞處說則是徹頭徹尾的謊言。
解放台灣的鄭成功 不被提及
影片甚至沒有提及鄭成功。他是明朝末年領導人,抵抗滿清佔據中國,並將荷蘭人逐出台灣而撤退到這裡。鄭的孫子最後向北京的清廷投降。此後的幾個世紀裡,台灣一直是中國的一部分,直到北京政府在海戰中打敗仗,於1895年將台灣割讓給日本。
《隱形國家》也沒有提到由盟國起草要求日本無條件投降條款的《波茨坦宣言》(Potsdam Declaration),要日本將台灣交還給中國。在整個戰爭期間,美國堅持承認台灣是中國的一部分。當尼克森總統訪問中國時,這種認知還一直存在,並得到卡特總統和此後歷屆美國總統的重申。
這部紀錄片確實正確地將李登輝的行為,歸因於在政治上擺脫國民黨政府的高壓統治。李登輝接替蔣介石的兒子蔣經國擔任領導人。蔣介石於1949年從大陸撤退到台灣,蔣經國於1978年上任,開始實行自由化並放鬆對台灣的控制。他挑選李登輝擔任副總統,因為李是在台灣出生。
蔣經國可能不知道李有一個日本名字叫岩里政男。眾所周知,以日語為母語的李登輝曾向來訪的日本政要透露,自己更偏向日本,而不是中國。事實上,他哥哥在二戰期間身為日本皇軍成員戰死,他的名字與其他戰死者以及一些被定罪的戰犯一起被供奉在東京靖國神社。
二戰結束後,仍有不少日本人留在台灣。他們改用中文姓氏,並融入當地社會。忠誠度分裂問題以及估計有十萬日本人和其後代對台灣政治的影響,一直沒有被研究。
阿扁也沒有被提及
以李登輝為例,他在擔任台灣政府領導人後,逐步破壞和削弱國民黨,為台灣從反對派民進黨中選出首任總統,鋪平了道路,從而終結國民黨長達55年的不間斷統治。不知何故,本應在紀錄片中佔顯著位置的陳水扁,在《隱形國家》中卻一次也沒有被提及。
陳水扁不僅成為民進黨首任總統,更巧妙地操縱和分化反對陣營,而成為唯一以低於40%的得票率獲勝的總統。他也成為首位在任期結束後因貪腐而立即入獄的台灣總統。他是那種會為任何民主制度帶來毀譽的總統,人們很難責怪這部紀錄片的導演將陳排除在敘述之外。
除了成為台灣近代史上的污點外,陳水扁還下令重新編寫學童的歷史教科書。修訂後的教科書刪除了任何有關台灣與中國歷史、文化和民族血統聯繫的內容。一個世代的台灣年輕人在成長過程中並不知道,他們的祖先並不是從地裡冒出來,而是世世代代從閩南跨過台灣海峽而來。台灣話聽起來跟閩南地區的閩南話幾乎一模一樣。如果有機會學習中國歷史,他們就會知道,早在西元前200年左右的漢代,大陸就已經知悉這個沿海島嶼了。
帶頭發起向日葵抗議活動的年輕人,一股腦地高呼自由,卻未意識到台灣經濟對大陸貿易的依賴,就也毫不奇怪了。每年台灣對大陸的貿易順差,都超過對世界其他地區的貿易逆差總合。這是北京刻意給予台灣特殊優惠政策的成果。
向日葵抗議者的暴力程度不如2019年的香港抗議者,但也同樣破壞公共財產、入侵政府議會、侮辱民選官員。這一切都被紀錄在這部紀錄片中。但既然是打著爭取民主的旗號,在過程中觸犯幾條法律又有什麼大不了的呢?
當然,台灣的年輕人也不全是傻瓜。聰明並有成就的人明白,他們的未來取決於快速成長的大陸經濟。許多人居住在大陸,並為位於中國大陸的台灣公司工作。有些人甚至在中國本土公司工作。向日葵世代可能不關心經濟、工作和事業。但認真的年輕人並非如此。
民進黨的正面形象
這部電影自然出現了台灣現任總統蔡英文的許多言論和演講。其他在片中發言的人物,包括她的崇拜者和追隨者,甚至跨性別內閣部長。影片吹噓台灣是亞洲首個承認同性婚姻並保護性小眾(LGBTQ)權利的國家。當然,這是一種進步思維的表現,甚至比美國領先一步。
本片也收錄了聯邦眾議院議長普洛西(Nancy Pelosi)不顧一切忠告堅持訪台的片段,此舉令蔡英文和民進黨興奮不已。首府華盛頓最有權勢的女性會見台灣首位女總統,沒有比這更棒的事了。謝天謝地,《隱形國家》沒有收錄蔡英文向普洛西帶上「選美肩帶」的影片,也沒有討論普洛西如何踩踏紅線,極大加劇兩岸緊張局勢,引發解放軍的威脅性敵對反應。
影片本來可以採訪很多人,但都沒有採訪。他們本來可以採訪在大陸生活和工作的台灣人,詢問對兩岸關係的看法。他們本來可以採訪絕大多數台灣民眾,後者其實更願意維持現狀,既不追求統一,也不追求獨立。
他們本來可以訪問街上的人對與山姆大叔的關係有何看法:美國真的會來與台灣軍隊並肩作戰嗎?他們對華盛頓強迫蔡英文政府購買過時的武器有何感想?他們對於被迫從美國農民那裡購買受污染的豬肉有何感想?對於拜登強迫台積電將先進晶片工廠遷到亞利桑那州,然後遭遇預料之外的勞工問題、成本超支、建設延誤等問題,有何看法?還有,拜登是否尊重台灣的「主權」?
台灣是一個隱形國家,原因很簡單,即台灣根本不是一個國家,而是中國的一個省,就那麼簡單。Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-47190691982021409482023-11-04T10:12:00.047-07:002023-11-08T21:47:53.722-08:00Review of documentary on Taiwan: "Invisible Nation," invisible for a reason.Edited version of <b>Invisible for a reason</b> was posted on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/11/invisible-for-a-reason/">Asia Times</a>.
I was interviewed on national podcast, "Critical Hour." Critical_Hour_1342_seg_3.mp3
On Youtube video by Veterans for Peace, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT0IFTuzb7o&t=505s
A dear friend we have not seen for sometime invited us to attend a viewing of
“Invisible Nation,” at Stanford on Thursday evening. It was a chance to visit
with an old friend and pick up a light dinner promised by the organizers. By the
time we got there, all the bento boxes were taken. It was the first of a list of
disappointments.
Invisible Nation is billed as a documentary on Taiwan and is
beginning to be shown around America. By traditional standards of journalism, a
documentary film is supposed to inform and educate by presenting unadulterated
facts and let the viewers come to their own conclusion. “Invisible” makes a
mockery of the term of documentary.
It is an unabashedly adulation of Tsai Ing-wen and blanket endorsement of Taiwan as a model democracy.
The flaws of Invisible are many, mostly by calculated omissions of history and personal
information.
The film portrays Taiwan’s history beginning with the Dutch
colonization of the island and claims that the only time one government
controlled both the mainland and Taiwan was from 1945 to 1949. The government
was the short reign of Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang that reclaimed Taiwan
after the end of World War II, and ended when he had to flee from the mainland
to Taiwan. This is most misleading at best and outright lie at its worst.
<b>Koxinga, liberator of Taiwan, not in the narrative</b>
The film fails to even mention Koxinga, aka Zheng Chenggong, the end of Ming
dynasty leader who resisted the takeover of the mainland by the Manchus and
retreated to Taiwan by evicting the Dutch from the island. Zheng’s grandson
eventually surrendered to the Qing imperial court in Beijing. For centuries
thereafter, Taiwan was part of China until the Beijing government lost a sea war
to Japan and Taiwan was ceded to Japan in 1895.
Invisible also does not mention the Potsdam Declaration that stipulated the terms of Japan’s unconditional
surrender, drafted by the allies, in which Japan was to hand Taiwan back to
China. Throughout the war, United States was insistent in recognizing Taiwan as
part of China. This recognition persisted when President Richard Nixon went to
China and reaffirmed by President Jimmy Carter and by every American president
ever since.
The mockumentary did correctly attribute the actions of Lee Teng-hui
for the political turn away from the heavy-handed rule of the Nationalist
government. Lee succeeded Chiang Ching-kuo, the son of Chiang Kai-shek who led
the retreat from the mainland to Taiwan in 1949. The son took over in 1978 and
began to liberalize and loosen the control of the island. He selected Lee to be
his vice president because Lee was a Taiwan native born.
Chiang was probably
unaware that Lee also went by his Japanese name, Iwasato Masao. In fact,
Lee/Iwasato, a native speaker of Japanese, was known to confide to visiting
dignitaries from Japan that his allegiance leaned more to Japan than to China.
In fact, his older brother was killed in action during WWII as a member of the
Japanese imperial army and his name is enshrined in the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo
among other war dead and some convicted war criminals.
After WWII, there were
many Japanese that remained in Taiwan. They took on Chinese surnames and merged
into the local society. The question of divided loyalty and the influence of an
estimated hundred thousand Japanese that stayed along with their descendants on
Taiwan’s politics has not been studied.
<b>A Bian not in the narrative either</b>
In the case of Lee, after he assume the leadership of the Taiwan government, he
gradually undermined and weakened the KMT organization that paved the way for
Taiwan to elect its first president from the KMT opposition, the Democratic
Progressive Party, thus ending KMT’s 55 years of continuous rule. Somehow, the
name of Chen Shui-bian that should have figured prominently in the documentary
was not mentioned even once in Invisible.
Chen Shui-bian not only became the
first president from DPP, he cleverly manipulated and divided the opposition and
became the only president to win with less than 40% of the votes. He also became
the first Taiwan president to be immediately imprisoned for wanton corruption at
the end of his term of office. He was the kind of president that would give any
democracy a bad name and one can hardly blame the director of the documentary
for leaving Chen out of her story.
Aside from being a blot on Taiwan’s modern
history, Chen ordered a consequential rewrite of school children’s history
textbooks. Obliterated in the revised textbooks was any reference of Taiwan’s
linkage to China’s history, culture and ethnic origin.
A generation of young
Taiwanese people grew up not knowing that their ancestors did not spring out of
the ground but came across the Taiwan strait from southern Fujian for many
generations. That the Taiwan dialect sounds almost exactly the same as Minnan
dialect off southern Fujian. That if they had a chance to study Chinese history,
they would know that as early as the Han dynasty around 200 BCE, the mainland
already knew about the island offshore.
Small wonder that the generation of
young hotheads, that spearheaded the sunflower protest, screamed for freedom but
did not appreciate Taiwan’s economic dependence on trade with the mainland.
Every year, Taiwan’s trade surplus with mainland more than offset the entire
trade deficit with the rest of the world. The is a consequence of Beijing’s
deliberate policy to give Taiwan special preference.
The sunflower protesters
were not as violent as the Hong Kong protesters of 2019 but they nevertheless
destroyed public property, invaded the government parliament, and insulted
publicly elected officials. All of which was recorded in the mockumentary. But
since it was in the name of fighting for democracy, what’s the big deal of
breaking a few laws along the way?
Of course, not all Taiwan’s youth are
lunkheads. The intelligent, high achievers understand that their future lies
with the fast-growing mainland economy. Many live on the mainland and are
working for Taiwan companies located in China. Some are even working for locally
owned companies in China. The sunflower children may not care about economy,
jobs and a career. But the serious-minded young people do.
<b>A progressive image of DPP</b>
The film naturally featured many remarks and speeches by Tsai Ing-wen, the
current president of Taiwan. Other talking heads include her admirers and
followers, even transgender cabinet ministers. The film brag that Taiwan was the
first in Asia to recognize same sex marriage and protect the rights of the
LGBTQ. Certainly, a show of progressive mindset that is even steps ahead of the
U.S.
The film also included a clip of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s drop in visit
to Taiwan, against all advice but to the thrill of Tsai and the DPP. The most
powerful woman in Washington meeting with Taiwan’s first woman president. Could
not have gotten any better than this. Thank goodness, Invisible did not include
the video of Tsai bestowing a beauty pageant sash on Pelosi. Also not included
was any discussion on how Pelosi having stepped on the red line, greatly raised
the cross-strait tension and prompted threatening hostile reaction from the PLA.
But there were a lot of folks the film could have interviewed but did not. They
could have interviewed the Taiwanese living and working on the mainland on their
perspective of the cross-strait relations. They could have interviewed the vast
majority of the people on Taiwan that prefer the status quo, neither for
unification or independence.
They could have asked the persons on the street on
what they thought of the relations with Uncle Sam: Will the US really come to
fight alongside the troops of Taiwan? How do they feel about Washington forcing
the Tsai government to buy old outdated weapons? How do they feel about being
forced to buy tainted pork from American farmers? What do they think of Biden’s
strong arming Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing into moving their advanced chip
fabs to Arizona, and then run into unforeseen labor problem, cost overrun, and
construction delays? Has Biden shown any respect for Taiwan’s “sovereignty?”
Taiwan is an invisible nation for a simple reason. Taiwan is not a nation but a
province of China. Simple as that.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-38982354950003418162023-10-30T15:10:00.001-07:002023-11-06T15:13:32.538-08:00Discussion of the Hamas Israeli WarThe YouTube discussion can be found on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAmF7Sgsmv4
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-56025208177503286852023-09-04T09:16:00.001-07:002023-09-04T09:16:08.490-07:00Raimondo given a Bronx cheer in ChinaA shorter version was posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/09/us-commerce-secretarys-china-visit-overshadowed/">Asia Times</a>.
While US Commerce Secretary, Gina Raimondo, was visiting Beijing, she witnessed a spontaneous celebration among the Chinese people. The gleeful outburst had nothing to do with her meetings with the Chinese leaders, but was a raucous cheer for the reemergence of Huawei’s smart phone business.
By disclosing the availability of a new smart phone, Mate 60 pro, on the company website, Huawei quietly let their customers in China know that Huawei has re-entered the mobile phone business.
Word on Mate 60 pro spread like wild fire on China’s social media. Even though Huawei provided virtually no background information on their new phone, the initial allotment was sold out on the first day.
Visitors to the website can see that Huawei’s smart phone is priced slightly less than Apple iPhone 14 with functionality similar to the 14. The one notable difference is that the speed of Huawei’s phone is faster and meets the specification of a 5G able smart phone.
Third parties immediately took apart the Mate 60 pro and reported that there was no evidence of any US technology inside the phone. The phone is driven by Kirin 9000S chip, a chip designed and made in China and uses Harmony OS, Huawei’s own operating system.
There are many other fine technical differences between Huawei’s latest smart phone and its competitors. The essential point to me is that Huawei is back after three years in the wilderness.
Since 2019, the US began to levy a series of sanctions on the company denying it access to advanced chip designs and the availability of Taiwan Semiconductor to make the chips for them. Each successive restriction was designed to strangle Huawei out of the smart phone business.
<b>Bronx cheer for Raimondo</b>
In a way, Huawei’s action did have to do with Raimondo. The company moved up the unveiling of Mate 60 pro to coincide with her visit. To most of China’s netizens, it was Huawei’s way for calling her and the Biden’s administration’s attention that no obstruction imposed by the US will keep Huawei down for long.
They have not disclosed how they achieve the necessary technological advances, but one thing is clear. The company could not have made all the advances without partners in China and without creating a domestic supply chain, from design software, semiconductor fabrication to essential chemicals and materials.
What Huawei has accomplished will ripple through China’s semiconductor industry. Huawei’s experience will facilitate and encourage others to follow. China’s self-sufficiency in semiconductors will only increase.
Heretofore, China represents almost one-third of the world’s market for semiconductors. Before the US mounted the trade war, it was more convenient for China to buy than to make their own. Now that they are forced to go on their own, China is, consequently, not importing as much, and total import is declining by double digits annually.
American’s shortsighted strategy to de-couple from China will devastate the revenue of leading US providers of advance chips such as Nvidia and Qualcomm and chip making equipment companies such as Applied Material and Lam Research.
These companies will see their comparative advantages dry up on the vine. In the near term, they are not allowed to sell to China. In the long term, China will not need to buy from them.
Washington’s policy makers failed to appreciate that China is no technological slouch. When pushed against a wall, China will back their national interest with the needed funds and talent to overcome any obstacle.
In October 1964, China detonated its first atomic bomb and less than three years later the hydrogen bomb, a faster sequence of milestones than any other country. These efforts were led by an all-Chinese team of scientists, some were returnees trained in the west but otherwise received no input from the US or USSR, the only members of the nuclear club at the time.
More recently in 2020, China launched an unmanned spacecraft to Mars, and became the first nation to carry out an orbiting, landing and sending a rover to the Martian surface in the same mission; success on its first try. That’s an impressive demonstration of their confidence and their competence.
<b>Technical leapfrog is another way</b>
China also resorts to a strategy of making advances by technological leapfrog. For example, China has been hopelessly behind the West in automobiles based on gasoline fired combustion engine. Therefore, more than 10 years ago, China set a stepwise national target for adopting the electric vehicles. Now, they are the world’s leading maker and exporter of EVs and batteries for the EV as well.
Same could happen in semiconductors. China is investing heavily in research and development of alternate, non-silicon substrate material for semiconductors. When they succeed, they will assume the leadership of the next generation of semiconductor chips.
It is understood that China’s navy is closing the gap with the US navy. Their shipbuilding capacity is many times larger than the US (more than 200 times according to US Navy) and they are building successive generations of warships in tandem and not in sequence.
In other words, even before the current ship has been launched, the shipyard is already building the next model, each with higher displacement and more firepower than the last. Apparently, they don’t need sea trials and shakedown cruises to know they are doing the right thing.
China has successfully test fired their hypersonic missiles at speeds more than ten times the speed of sound, while the US has not. When these missiles are installed in their ships, their deadly range will vastly exceed the US.
It's time for Washington to realize and accept the fact that efforts to suppressing China is a waste of our national priority and damaging to our national interest. We will rue the day when our insistence on making China our adversary become a reality.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-29522908468897189032023-06-16T14:56:00.000-07:002023-06-16T14:56:11.858-07:00Biden’s contrasting styles and priorities - The Biden administration has concentrated virtually all its efforts on keeping China from rising, to no availI celebrated my 85th birthday by writing this piece for <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/06/bidens-contrasting-styles-and-priorities/">Asia Times</a>.
For weeks, US President Joe Biden publicly demanded that the issue of raising the debt ceiling was a done deal and not negotiable. As the prospects of national default loomed, the Biden White House quietly began negotiations with Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and arrived at a compromise in the nick of time so as to avert default.
It seems Biden understood, after all, that avoiding the disaster of a default and the mortal pain on the American economy was more important than sticking by his guns. However, he apparently does not understand that the outcome of his negotiations with China is equally crucial to America’s future; his approach has been steadily unyielding, unfriendly and unhelpful.
Biden’s China team has adopted a strategy of saying one thing and then doing just the opposite. Every one of his cabinet officers would declare that he or she wishes to meet with their Chinese counterparts to discuss cooperation and collaboration – but always on the US terms, meaning that the US reserves the right to discuss the issues it wants to discuss, but will continue to criticize, attack and sanction China on others.
This is the way an imperious hegemonic power acts toward a subordinate country and expects obeisance and compliance. Except China no longer sees itself as a lesser power to the US. China has simply ignored the many White House requests.
The latest example came at the Shangri-La security forum in Singapore. The US had asked for a meeting between Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and his counterpart Li Shangfu on the sidelines of the forum. China refused. The US promptly accused China of irresponsible behavior endangering the bilateral relations by not keeping the lines of communication open.
US wants to meet with China for what purpose?
Of course, communicating and agreeing to face-to-face meetings are two separate matters. China expects prospects of a useful outcome to justify arranging in-person meetings. For possible constructive results, China wants to see serious and sincere gestures from the US.
All too frequently in previous meetings, the American officials viewed them as opportunities to crow about China giving in to American demands, whether actually true or not.
That Biden did not even bother to lift the personal sanction imposed on Li Shangfu during Donald Trump’s administration and still expects to have a summit meeting of military leaders seems stupid and arrogant.
Mind you, Li was sanctioned for purchasing fighter jets from Russia on behalf of China as part of his duty at the time in charge of procurement for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). What right does the US have to sanction an official of another country for doing his job? India buys arms from Russia; Turkey buys arms from Russia, apparently with no sanctions.
This is just one example of Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s “rules-based international order.” That order is arbitrary and is whatever the US says it is. Blinken was hankering for an invitation to meet in Beijing. Then the wandering weather balloon from China gave him the excuse to cancel the visit on an invitation that never came. Not only that, he reaped a PR dividend by blaming China for the debacle.
Examples of hypocrisy and deception abound. Biden warmly embraced Xi Jinping in Bali and swore by the one-China principle and that Taiwan is part of China. Then he openly sells arms to Taiwan and impose complete sanctions of export semiconductor technology to China.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen goes out of her way to ask China for support of the US treasury debt and then goes to Africa to warn African nations to beware of China’s debt-trap diplomacy.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo asked for a meeting with her counterpart to discuss increasing bilateral trade. What she actually meant was she wanted China to buy more but did absolutely nothing to reduce the tariffs imposed on Chinese imports by the Trump administration that might actually raise the volume of bilateral trade.
US on the path of self-destruction
Decoupling from China is not his intention, Biden claims, but then every action by his team is just the opposite. Every prospective bilateral outcome has to be on US terms, or else. What the Biden White House does not appreciate is that it has embarked on a path of self-destruction for America.
The damaging blowback from Biden’s China policy may not be as obvious as not raising the debt ceiling, but there is a strong element of cutting off Uncle Sam’s nose to spite his face that the leaders in Washington seem oblivious to. Just a few examples follow.
When Biden first came to office, if he had intended to resume a constructive relationship with China, he could have eliminated the tariffs levied by Trump on Chinese imports. Instead, he retained the tariffs despite hurting the American consumer much more severely than China’s manufacturers. The desire to inflict pain on China far outweighed protecting Americans from even greater pain.
Whether it’s assembling new subway cars with Chinese components, installing the world’s most cost-effective port-handling cranes, or surveillance cameras made in China, Washington let its paranoia run wild and turned away the cost savings from buying superior products from China.
The sanction of Huawei is an extreme case. Huawei has developed the world’s most advanced fifth-generation (5G) telecommunication system, which has received acceptance around the world. Because of US fear of being spied upon, Washington not only has refused to buy from Huawei but pressured many of its allies to rip out billions of dollars’ worth of Huawei equipment already installed.
After enduring the US sanctions for three years, Huawei has just announced the complete replacement of operating software based on Western technology. It will now sell to the world without any constraints, while the United States’ allies suffer hundreds of billions of dollars from the teardown of already installed Huawei equipment and the huge opportunity costs 0f not having a state-of-the-art telecommunication system.
China has also surpassed the US in EVs
Of course, telecom is not the only technology where China has surpassed the US. Among others, China’s emergence as the world’s leading producer of electric vehicles and owner of leading technology for the batteries that go into the EVs has taken the West by surprise. China has become the No 1 exporter of EVs around the world.
Ford and Tesla, among many automakers in the West, would like CATL to build an advanced battery plant next to their EV plants in the US. (CATL is abbreviation for Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd headquartered in Ningde, China, and is an acknowledged leader in EV battery technology.)
The potential deals raise interesting questions. Will Beijing forbid CATL’s transfer of battery technology to the US along the same logic as Washington’s semiconductor sanction on China? Or will some senator, such as a Marco Rubio, raise the specter of Chinese batteries in EVs forming a terrifying network for spying on America?
Biden thought he had cleverly jumpstarted the US semiconductor industry by snatching a leading-edge operation from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co to Phoenix, Arizona. Now the TSMC management has discovered that they are not able to hire enough people from an American workforce that are qualified and/or willing to work in the rigors of a Taiwanese operation.
In the meantime, the people of Taiwan are feeling increasing betrayed by America’s ham-fisted ways. This is a classic lose-lose outcome in the making.
Another is Defense Secretary Austin’s insistence on playing the “freedom of navigation” game in waters around China and flying surveillance planes off coastal China. Since Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei last year, China has emphasized its territorial claim over Taiwan and has been increasingly aggressive in responding to American intrusions in Beijing’s back yard.
Just last Saturday, a US destroyer along with a trailing Canadian frigate attempted to sail through the Taiwan Strait, which China regards as its territorial waters. In response to this provocation, a Chinese destroyer intercepted the American warship and forced it to change course.
Obviously, the PLA is increasingly willing for a showdown over whether China’s territorial waters can continue to be treated as America’s international waters. The firepower and technology of the PLA warships have surpassed the Americans’, and the Chinese appear confident and ready to put it to a test.
If the US Navy should succeed in provoking the PLA into a firefight, it is certain that both parties would be losers.
China has more friends than US has allies
Geopolitically, the US continues to count on the Group of Seven and a handful of other countries to be its allies. Biden’s stipulation is to insist on strict compliance of his foreign policy even at the expense of each ally’s own national interest.
Consequently, France is becoming a doubting Thomas about the wisdom of going along with the US, South Korea is trying to wriggle out of not losing China’s sales, as is ASML of the Netherlands. Germany and Australia in their own ways are holding on to their trade relations with China. In sum, the American alliance is increasingly questioning the shakiness of US leadership.
Concurrent to American hectoring over its version of “rule-based” order, 19 countries have expressed interest in joining BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) purely for the economic advantages of being a body that requires no military allegiance.
Saudi Arabia along with other oil-producing countries becoming members of BRICS+ will change the global alignment. The body will be far more populous and economically powerful than the US-aligned G7+.
And, by the way, a top agenda item for the new BRICS is to discuss a plan to introduce a new currency to replace the need to settle trade accounts in US dollars. This move is in direct response to Biden weaponizing the dollar and denying dollar access to countries he doesn’t like, such as Russia.
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has just come into full force. Members of the partnership consist of the 10 ASEAN countries plus China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. They will enjoy booming, tariff-free trade among themselves. The US is on the outside looking in.
Since China initiated the Belt and Road Initiative 10 years ago, around 150 countries have become beneficiaries of projects and investments through BRI. At reasonable financing terms, China supplies their expertise to build infrastructure such as ports, railroad, highways, bridges, airports and many others to enhance the economic development of the recipient country.
By far, BRI has been China’s most effective tool for making friends around the world.
The US? It stands impotently on the sidelines and watches with envy, and occasionally throws stones by calling these BRI projects debt traps.
Despite Washington’s mighty effort to suppress and obstruct China’s rise, China has become relatively impervious to American sanctions and restrictions. Just like Huawei, China’s semiconductor industry will find ways around the ban.
At the same time, China has become the foremost trading partner to virtually every country in the world. China’s economy remains strong and technological innovations will continue, hardly affected by actions from Washington.
The Biden administration has concentrated virtually all its efforts on keeping China from rising, to no avail. At the same time, the administration has not done anything concrete to lift the competitiveness of the American economy.
In a long line of mediocre leadership, Biden may prove the be the worst.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-17192661265241870932023-05-01T11:04:00.000-07:002023-05-01T11:04:25.940-07:00What does it mean when India overtakes China? There is more to becoming a world power than sheer numbersFirst posted on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/04/what-does-it-mean-for-india-to-overtake-china/">Asia Times</a>.
As India is about to overtake China to become the most populous in the world, The New York Times promises a future series of articles speculating on how India might change the world as China has in the last 40-plus years.
I am certain that India being the largest democracy in the world will be mentioned ad nauseam, but other considerations might be overlooked. I would like to provide a broader framework in the interest of a comprehensive discussion.
As my teacher and good friend Martin Jacques has repeatedly argued, China is a civilization state unlike any nation as defined by the West. India can also be considered a civilization state, but with major differences.
In the 3rd century BCE, China had a brutal and cruel leader with a vision that united all seven warring states. Qin Shi Huang became China’s first emperor. He standardized the spoken and written language, the currency, the weight and other measures and even the width of the wagon axles on the roads. He wanted to live forever, but at least his legacy survived.
A national identity
Most important, the first emperor established a national identity for all the ethnic peoples living in China. In time, these people responded to the Chinese culture and assimilated into the Chinese way of life, gradually discarding their own original heritage.
Today, we say China is made up of nearly 92% ethnic Han, the remainder being 50-some other identifiable minorities. Actually, the Han Chinese are made up of a mixed gene pool of many other tribes that have faded into history. There is no “purebred Chinese” per se.
Missing in India’s history is that one strong unifying figure to rally the disparate groups of people and establish a national identify. India still recognizes 16 official languages along with other unofficial ones, and people many cannot communicate with another. Contrary to popular impression, only 10% of the population can speak English.
The closest to a national identity is the one imposed by the British rule on the Indian subcontinent for nearly 100 years between the 19th and 20th centuries. The Brits, of course, were not there to construct an Indian identity. They were there to exploit, colonize and enslave the indigenous people.
Consequently, Indians today have a much weaker sense of who they are as compared with the Chinese. It’s harder for them to know their ethnicity, other than the idea of attaining the mythical stature of a white Aryan as nirvana.
India continues to be hobbled by the caste system, a legacy of its culture. This means that by virtue of their parentage, more than 300 million Indians will be socially stigmatized and economically marginalized with no hope of realizing their potential. Their children and grandchildren suffer the same fate.
Caste system is India’s worst obstacle
Another reflection from the mindset of the caste system is that India’s elite schools are reserved for the privileged few. Quality of the non-elite universities is not high. Most, especially women, cannot get into India’s better schools for lack of seats.
China has about four times as many universities as India, and some have been placed among the world’s top 100 institutions of higher learning. Functional literacy is over 90% in China and about 60% in India. In Chinese culture, education is life’s highest priority.
The difference in the two countries’ systems of government is one the West loves to extol. India is the world’s largest democracy, while China is not a (Western style) democracy.
What is that supposed to mean? From my perspective, India is constrained by all the limitations of a Western democracy. The government talks a lot but does not get much done. Corruption is rife at every level. The poor are condemned to stay poor. Come to think of it, it reminds me of another democracy, the United States.
However, given its huge population, India can boast about its relatively small group of brilliant and talented people, those who are fortunate enough to have realized their full potential. One obvious example is the corps of business executives originally from India who are dominating corporate America.
For India to realize its full potential as a nation, it needs to stop seeing itself as an Anglo-Saxon country, and join the Global South to contribute to the wealth and well-being of the coalition of people of color.
India needs to raise the quality of higher education and open access to every citizen. Only by allowing every person the opportunity to realize his or her full potential can India become another emerging pillar of technology and industry.
To create jobs for the growing body of educated youth, India needs to attract foreign investment. This means less red tape and a total absence of corruption, and, of course, prompt completion of infrastructure projects.
Lessons from China
Contrary to the Western idea that conflict is the way to peace, India should proactively approach China to resolve their border dispute. So silly to argue over a Line of Control drawn by a Brit more than a century ago (the McMahon Line).
For India truly to overtake China and become a new emerging world leader, it would need to learn two essential lessons from China.
One lesson, relatively easy to do, is to greatly improve the quality of education and boost the quantity of the workforce. The government then would have to eliminate corruption at every level and bureaucratic red tape to make foreign direct investment easy and attractive. FDI creates jobs and raises GDP.
The second lesson, much more challenging, is to launch a cultural revolution on a scale that surpasses even the one in China, but with a constructive end-point rather than a destructive one. The objective of an Indian revolution is to truly eliminate caste, liberate women, and give all the opportunity to realize their potential.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-66066823459321160362023-04-06T10:10:00.002-07:002023-04-06T10:10:47.043-07:00China's version of democracyAs told by mayors of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEM903DsC5U%20%281:46:00%29">four cities in China</a>.
Hi All,
My friend and colleague, K.J. Noh has introduced us to how China governs vs. the US system. The program from China interviewed mayors of 4 cities located in central China, coastal city in south China, northeast of China and Tibet. I have added an annotation for each city. I am passing this around because our government is spending millions of dollars to spread false information on China for no other reason than to justify making an enemy out of China. Please share this bi-lingual YouTube program to your circle of friends and neighbors. We can do our little bit to reverse the anti-China sentiment.
Best,
George
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 11:38 PM kiji noh <k.j.noh48@gmail.com> wrote:
This fascinating, inspiring documentary about Chinese mayors gives us insight into Chinese governance, public policy, accountability and what it means to "serve the people".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEM903DsC5U (1:46:00)
Watch this film and you can see why China is constantly getting better.
Why the Government has 90+% popularity.
It's the quality of its leadership and the mechanisms for making it better.
The documentary takes us to 4 different cities/prefectures: Hefei, Yanbian, Zhangzhou, Nagqu, and then has a synoptic discussion about China's whole process democracy. Along the way, we see people, policies, economies, as well as the beautiful nature and the distinct indigenous cultures of each region (At 35:20 you can see the sacrifices)
If you prefer to watch in shorter episodes:
Ep1: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75m3JZpTOWY">Hefei City</a>, Anhui: Innovation, Environment, Employment (19:26)
The city invests in innovation and the environment for the betterment of the peoples' livelihood.
The political leaders dispenses fund to help the city and do not need to collect funds for their political campaigns.
Ep2: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhO0Ais8t7s">Yanbian</a> Korean Autonomous Prefecture, Jilin: Soccer, Farming, Farmer's dance (14:30)
This city promotes local sports participation, people vote for officials that have done the most for the people,
Ethnic Korean mayor took a salary cut to enter local politics and he actively promotes preservation of Korean culture and dance
Ep3: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1OUpygQrw4">Zhangzhou City</a>, Fujian: Buildings, Business, Beaches (25:35)
Mayor helps residents preserve and restore world heritage & famous roundhouses; 87 year old Taiwanese owner of major tea company won't retire, being successful is too much fun, facilitated by the mayor ensuring that the Taiwanese investors are pleased to be in Zhangzhou. (A majority of Taiwanese ancestors originated from Zhangzhou.)
Ep4: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlQ3rZeDBdg">Nagqu</a>, Tibet Autonomous Region: Caring for Vulnerable Nature & People (25:57)
Young Tibetan mayor modestly admits he's very much learning on the job.
Ep5: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKNPu_z7YDI">Chinese Democracy vs. American Democracy</a>: "promises vs performance" (12:32)
This episode is pretty much self explanatory. As one mayor explained, we are products of democracy every step along the way, who has ever heard of someone getting elected to a high level office without showing any proven experience at every lower level of office? Promotion is based on past performances. In every city in China,12345 is the direct line to the mayor's office.
Ep6: Delivering Democracy: people oriented democracy (4:34)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw5Rbt38mCs
Trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMFzi7GN4-U
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-41173600004982506062023-04-06T09:58:00.001-07:002023-04-06T09:58:33.952-07:00Contrasting styles of global leadershipA shorter version of this commentary was first posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/04/xi-biden-show-contrasting-styles-of-world-leadership/">Asia Times</a>.
Early this January, I opined in Asia Times that “2023 bodes poorly for US international relations” under US President Joe Biden. I based my conclusion on China’s impressive success in making new friends vs. the Biden administration’s inability to make any.
In less than three months since then, developments around the world have been seismic and spectacular and have made a prophet out of me, if I do say so myself.
In January, I reported that China President Xi Jinping received the red-carpet treatment from Saudi Arabia, concluded a $25 billion deal for oil and met with the six Middle East nations that make up the Gulf Cooperation Council. Hosted by Saudi, they talked about China buying energy and helping them build their infrastructure.
Two years earlier, China entered a 25-year strategic cooperation agreement with Iran. Thus, China has become friends of both major sects of Islam that have been historically bitter rivals. (To be honest, I did not expect anything earthshaking out of all this.)
Then earlier this March, China announced that after four days of meeting and discussion in Beijing, Saudi Arabia and Iran have agree to resume diplomatic relations.
A peace deal for the ages
This was a big deal and caught the world by surprise. Heretofore, Saudi representing the Sunnis while Iran the Shiites have been bitter sectarian foes for centuries. Yet, China was able to play the role of an honest broker and brought the two sides together.
China has the right set of credentials to be a mediator for peace. China is the second strongest global power, but does not try to bully any lesser countries and seeks to get along with everyone.
China emphasizes three principles in their international relations: respect the national sovereignty of the other, does not interfere with the internal affairs of the other, and seek joint development based on common interests and mutual benefits.
A few days later, Xi called on his “good friend,” Russia President Vladimir Putin in Moscow and brought with him a 12-point peace plan to resolve the conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
The west promptly labeled the peace plan as vague, ambiguous and did not include terms that would revert Russian occupied territories back to Ukraine. But the west missed the point that was clear to everybody else in the world. Namely, a true mediation for peace does not begin by stipulating what the outcome should look like. That is up to the outcome of negotiations by the two principals.
Zelensky would like China to step in
But as pointed out in Asia Times, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky may find China’s peace proposal an acceptable starting point. He is facing western allies getting weary of supporting the war. Without such support, Zelensky knows his goose is cooked.
While Japan’s prime minister, Fumio Kishida was visiting Kiev acting as Washington’s envoy to encourage keeping the war going, Zelensky publicly welcomed China’s participation to broker a peace deal. He obviously found comfort in China’s ability to bring peace between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
While Xi Jinping is enhancing his stature as a world leader that is proactive for peace, what has happened to Joe Biden during the same period?
History will show that blowback from two of Biden’s worst decisions ever made has come to haunt him in the first quarter of 2023.
In 2022, Biden imposed economic sanctions and confiscated all the Russian dollar holdings held in the US in an attempt to bring Russia to its knees. But it didn’t work. Russia’s economy turned out to be far more resilient than Washington expected.
Weaponizing the dollar is a big blunder
Barred from trade with the EU and others in the west, Russia turned to trade with China, India, East Asia and global south. Trade with China will surpass $200 billion this year and Russia has agreed to accept China’s renminbi to settle their transactions.
As Russia earn a bounty of yuan from energy sales to China, other countries see the advantage of accepting the yuan from Russia for their trade, thus avoiding the extra cost of having to convert their own currency into dollars.
Since China is likely to be their most important trading partner, yuan from Russia can simply be used when they do business with China. Brazil is the latest major trading nation to announce acceptance of the yuan to settle their accounts with China.
These developments are not sufficient to dislodge the dollar as the global reserve currency but do indicate that other nations are eager to by-pass the dollar.
By weaponizing the dollar, Biden has succeeded in planting the idea in other central banks that the dollar is no longer a reliable reserve currency.
Recently, ASEAN countries held a meeting to discuss ways to avoid using the dollar, euro or yen to settle their trade accounts. If not those, what then? Probably China’s yuan and their own currencies.
Indeed, China and even Japan have been reducing their dollar holdings. In recent months, China and Russia have been the major buyers of gold, no doubt with the dollars they held.
The recent collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank is an indicator that the US economy is caught between the rock and a hard place. To tamp down inflation, the Fed has to raise the interest rate. Rising interest rate means a decreasing value of the long-term treasury bonds that the bank bought that pay lower interest rates. Thus, the decline in the value of the collateral asset owned by SVB made the bank vulnerable to a bank run.
Most American banks operated in much the same way as SVB but were more fortunate because the Treasury department quickly stepped in and injected liquidity to reassure depositors that their banks won’t go the way of SVB.
American economy needs China’s help
To use a Chinese expression, Treasure Secretary Janet Yellen and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo have been acting like ants running around a hot griddle, wanting and waiting for an invitation to visit Beijing.
Why? Because Yellen wants to urge China to continue buying American IOUs and Raimondo would like to raise the level of bilateral trade, which would help keep the US economy going.
Somehow, these Biden cabinet officers do not know how to ask nicely nor diplomatically. They seem to assume that a public announcement of their wish is good enough for Beijing to express mail an invitation to their offices. It has not occurred to them that Beijing needs to know what’s in it for China to meet with them.
The Biden administration has the arrogance to presume that they can pick and choose the economic sectors that they can decouple from China and which to select for collaboration with China.
Apparently, Biden does not understand that China does not see itself as a vassal state but has its own priorities. Decouple is a two-way street. Both Testa and Ford have asked Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd. to build a battery plant in the US. CATL is the world leader in lithium battery technology and dominant supplier to makers of electric vehicles.
China may well deny CATL an export license to locate a plant in the US for fear that the US would commandeer its world leading, proprietary technology, just as Biden has done in shipping advanced fab belonging to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing from Taiwan to Arizona.
Obviously there exists a huge deficit of trust between the US and China. Nothing Biden has done is in the direction of healing the rift.
Blowing up Nord Stream is the other blunder
The revelation by Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Seymour Hersh that Biden ordered the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines has further emphasized that Biden is an unethical and ruthless national leader that cannot be trusted.
Biden has shown that he has no qualms in committing a war crime by severing the key economic linkage between Russia and the EU. Cutting off cheap energy from Russia has wreaked economic turmoil on his European allies. That Biden would do this to his own allies will shake EU allies’ trust and confidence in the US for years to come.
As matters stand now, Xi Jinping represents a proactive world leader that will use his influence and prestige to work for world peace. Despite all the slander heaped on him and the blackening of China by Washington and the western media, a long queue of world leaders are jostling to meet with him in Beijing to discuss economic cooperation and collaboration on world peace.
At the other end of the world is Joe Biden, a world leader that is dishonest and unethical and has earned the wary distrust of virtually every national leader in the world. He gives lip service to peace while creating conflict and intimidating smaller countries to join the US military alliance and prepare to “volunteer” in Washington’s proxy wars. Even his closest ally has to watch its back lest it’s abruptly discarded when it no longer figures in the US national interest.
If, nay when the world majority chooses peace over war, then there would be no need for any country to depend on American military protection for security—a protection often promised but seldom delivered.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-77040800325096007882023-04-04T00:28:00.001-07:002023-04-04T00:28:27.328-07:00Trust deficit of US has been self-inflictedFirst published in <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202304/03/WS642a26f2a31057c47ebb7f71.html">China Daily</a>.
In the United States, we have a popular saying: "You can't have your cake and eat it too", which is another way of saying that you cannot have it both ways. Yet this is exactly what President Joe Biden's administration is trying to do with China.
It treats China like a bitter adversary. The Biden administration even has hundreds of millions of dollars allocated to encourage Western media to blacken China's reputation at every opportunity, even resorting to distortion and fabrication to achieve their objective. Yet when they need China's help, Biden expects Beijing to comply and act as a willing supporter.
Some recent examples come to mind. At the G20 Summit in Bali in October, Biden reaffirmed the one-China principle and said he would do nothing to interfere with Taiwan as part of China. Of course, right after he left Bali, he ordered advanced weapons for Taiwan and commandeered part of Taiwan Semiconductor Co from the island's city of Hsinchu to the US state of Arizona.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen flew to Switzerland specifically to intercept China's then vice-premier Liu He on his way to Davos. She asked for China's support for the dollar by continuing to buy US Treasury IOUs. She then flew on to Africa to warn African nations of China's so-called debt-trap diplomacy — without any evidence whatsoever.
On the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference in February, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with Chinese senior diplomat Wang Yi, boasting later that he gave a stern warning that China must not give weapons to Russia, or it would face dire consequences. Wang, who is now a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee, let it be known that the shooting down by the US of a weather balloon that wandered into US airspace was a hysterical response.
Hysteria and paranoid logic run wild in Washington. Kits for new subway cars provided by China and assembled in the US were feared to be a vehicle for spying. The ubiquitous TikTok may be thrown out of the US because it is owned by a Chinese entrepreneur.
The US has concluded that the best way to deal with its rotting infrastructure, proliferating number of homeless people, drug overdoses and mass shootings is to kick the can down the road and let the next round of politicians face the challenges.
In the meantime, rather than confronting the real challenges at home, they work on blaming everything on China.
At the beginning of his administration, Biden could have reset relations with China, but he doubled down instead. Blinken and others have gone around promising positive relations with every country, only to stab them in the back. This has been especially true with their dealings with China. Right now, Biden desperately needs to meet with President Xi Jinping to get China's support for the US debt, but he thinks he can get that support while trashing China and freezing China from access to semiconductor technology.
Under his leadership, the US has become a nation that inflicts self-harm by a thousand cuts. By unilaterally destroying Iraq and Libya, the US instilled fear in others. By unilaterally confiscating foreign reserves belonging to Afghanistan and Russia, Biden behaved like the mafia. All the world can now see that holding on to the dollar and keeping it in the US is fraught with danger.
Under these circumstances, why would China want to buy more Treasury bills? That would only enable the Federal Reserve to print more dollars and run up the deficit. In fact, China is converting extra dollars into gold and spending the remainder as rapidly as possible. China is also working with Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing states to accept the renminbi instead of the petrodollar. More than 100 countries that trade with China are already willing to hold renminbi as part of their reserve currency. All are motivated to avoid owning dollars.
The US under Biden's leadership now suffers a huge credibility gap and trust deficit with the rest of the world. The US economy and therefore American taxpayers will pay dearly from the debt trap of Biden's own making.
The author, a US citizen of Chinese ancestry and a retired international business adviser, wrote this commentary especially for China Daily.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-2702491174815581602023-03-25T22:36:00.000-07:002023-03-25T22:36:04.992-07:00My comment on role of China as a world peacemakerGeorge Koo on the Historic Significance of the Xi-Putin Summit & impact on changing New World Order
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ew1Va54KB8
Video cast on Activist News Network.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-91414094768183932952023-03-10T23:13:00.000-08:002023-03-10T23:13:01.150-08:00China on cooperation and collaboration
This is China Daily's video of the Zoom interview. <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202303/04/WS640296c7a31057c47ebb2180.html">China's science, tech collaboration a big plus for world</a> - World - Chinadaily.com.cnGeorgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-89280034878720668172023-02-18T23:23:00.001-08:002023-02-18T23:23:54.672-08:00Nord Stream Explosions Hard to Cover-Up, Award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh has exposed the Biden administration’s role in sabotaging the pipelinesFirst posted on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/02/nord-stream-explosions-hard-to-cover-up/">Asia Times</a>.
The report “How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline” by Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Seymour Hersh states beyond any reasonable doubt that US President Joe Biden ordered the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines.
Thus if it wasn’t clear before, it is emphatically clear now that the US will impose its proprietary version of “rules-based international order” by any means possible including committing a crime against humanity.
The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines are jointly owned by the Russian energy corporation Gazprom and four European energy companies. Nord Stream 1 had been providing low-cost natural gas from Russia to Germany, which redistributed some of it to other parts of Europe. Nord Stream 2 was in the process of coming on stream and would have doubled the supply to Europe.
The explosions that took place on September 26, 2022, stopped the flow of Russian gas, and left hundreds of millions of Europeans facing the prospects of a cold winter.
The economic consequences of the Nord Stream sabotage were the quadrupling of energy costs and triggering rampant inflation in Europe the likes of which hadn’t been seen for decades.
President Biden wanted to make sure that Germany would strongly support Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. Blowing up the pipelines would ensure that Russia could no longer supply cheap energy to Europe and Germany wouldn’t have natural gas from Russia as a source of distraction from its support for Ukraine.
Biden had absolutely no justification for destroying property that did not belong to the US. Doing so would be naked aggression, an act of war, devoid of concern that the people and economies of friendly allies would suffer. He wouldn’t care that to achieve his sense of security for the US required committing a war crime.
Heretofore, we Americans have been telling the world that the United States of America is the citadel on top of the hill, a shining beacon of integrity and an example of what a freedom-loving democracy should be. Other nations are supposed to admire what we stand for and aspire to be just like us.
Shining beacon no more
Now, the world sees that Fortress America is corrupt, dishonest and shameless. The US suppresses other countries by force, intimidation or sanctions or a mixture of the above. Other nations comply with our demands not because they admire us but because they fear us.
If the US did indeed destroy the pipelines as Hersh reports, some in the inner circle of the Biden administration might try to defend its action by claiming that it was a reprisal for Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. In fact, according to Hersh, planning to blow up the pipelines was under way months before the Russian invasion began.
He further explained that the government of Norway was enlisted to help with the execution of the sabotage. One of the reasons for recruiting Norway was that it knew the shallow waters of the Baltic Sea better than anyone.
“On September 26, 2022, a Norwegian Navy P8 surveillance plane made a seemingly routine flight and dropped a sonar buoy,” Hersh reports. “The signal spread underwater, initially to Nord Stream 2 and then on to Nord Stream 1. A few hours later, the high-powered C4 explosives were triggered and three of the four pipelines were put out of commission.”
Norway’s participation is full of irony. The annual winner of the Nobel Peace Prize is selected by a committee appointed by the Norwegian parliament. One year, they rushed to give Peace Prize to incoming American president Barack Obama even before he assumed office.
History will credit Obama as the president who first popularized the use of drones as deadly killing machines, cold-blooded and indiscriminate. They were deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. In hindsight, these were not exactly the kind of credentials consistent with those of a Peace Prize laureate.
In a podcast interview subsequent to his exposé of the Nord Stream explosion, Hersh said that putting the story together was not difficult. Any reasonably competent investigative reporter could have followed the trail of telltale clues leading directly to the White House.
For months before the invasion of Ukraine and the explosion of the pipelines, President Biden and his foreign-policy team – national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Tony Blinken, and Victoria Nuland, the undersecretary of state for policy – had been vocal and consistent in their hostility to the two pipelines.
Biden gave the secret away
Biden and Nuland even publicly hinted to the media that the pipelines would “go away.” At the press briefing that followed German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’ visit to Washington in February last year, Biden said, “If Russia invades … there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”
Undersecretary Nuland also said at a State Department briefing, lightly covered by the media, “I want to be very clear to you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”
The reason the mainstream media did not bother to ask the obvious question as to who blew up the pipelines and why was either being lazy and uninquisitive or because they knew the answer and did not want to embarrass the Biden White House.
Even after the publication of Hersh’s report, mainstream media outlets such as The Washington Post and The New York Times did not even bother to contact him and interview him. By deliberately ignoring this story, they are not living up to their obligation as members of the fourth estate and protecting their integrity. In other words, they have betrayed public trust and sold out to the White House.
The US has always acted above the laws of other sovereign nations, even ignoring the laws of the United Nations. With compliant and docile media, the Biden team can go wild and run roughshod over anyone without a tinge of concern.
The worldwide disrespect for the US will grow. In time, The US will find itself alone and friendless in a unipolar world of its own lonesome.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-20952788645623021692023-02-06T17:20:00.002-08:002023-02-07T10:08:02.847-08:00Much ado about a well-timed balloon. Aside from a propaganda boon for the US, the incident got Antony Blinken off the hookFirst posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/02/much-ado-about-a-well-timed-balloon/">Asia Times</a>.
A huge white balloon equivalent in size to three buses drifted from China over Alaska and Canada, and then over Montana and across the US continent before reaching the Carolinas coast.
At that point, the Pentagon deemed it safe to send a couple of jet fighters supported by a fuel tanker to bring down the errant balloon and let the remnants fall into the Atlantic Ocean.
After firing missiles at the target, the mission was completed and deemed a triumphant success. And the brave pilots returned to home base safely.
The Biden White House first knew about the balloon on January 28 and shot it down a week later. In between, Washington expressed outrage, fear and anxiety over the “invasion” of a spy balloon from China.
Beijing’s official response was that it was a civilian balloon for weather surveillance that went off course and hardly warranted the extreme response of a missile attack.
Beijing did not feel it necessary to point out that high-flying balloons cannot gather intelligence as effectively as satellites or aircraft. The Pentagon certainly knows this better than anyone. It has been flying surveillance planes off the coast of China for years – though no balloons that we know of.
Needless to say, a highly visible white finish is hardly appropriate for a spy balloon that would logically want to be stealthy.
But it is, on the other hand, a well-known fact that thousands of weather balloons are released annually by many countries for the purpose of forecasting weather. Once in a while, a balloon will drift off course because of atmospheric conditions, which is not surprising and should not trigger any outpouring of emotional trauma.
Aside from the fact that the wandering balloon gave Washington the opportunity to make a mountain of propaganda against China’s “aggressiveness” molehill, otherwise known as xiaotidazhuo (小题大做), the incident also got Secretary of State Antony Blinken off the hook.
For weeks, Blinken has publicly announced his intention to visit Beijing. Then he got specific and set the dates of his visit as February 5 and 6. This presented China’s Foreign Ministry with a thorny problem.
Aside from not having extended a formal invitation, the Chinese didn’t know what to talk to Blinken about. China has experienced a litany of the US saying one thing and doing just the opposite. A trust deficit exists that can’t be papered over.
At the Group of Twenty Summit in Bali in November, US President Joe Biden promised to abide by the one-China principle, and then promptly enacted a bill to provide $10 billion worth of advanced weapons to Taiwan and celebrated the hijacking of a TSMC fab to Arizona.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen flew to Switzerland to meet with Vice-Premier Liu He, China’s economic czar, to ask for China’s support of American debt and not to divest US Treasury notes and bills that China was holding. Then she flew to Africa to badmouth China and warn Africans of Chinese “debt trap” diplomacy.
Since Blinken’s ill-fated first meeting with Chinese leaders in charge of foreign policy, in Anchorage, Alaska, in March 2021, he has not altered his style of diplomacy. It’s “here are my list of demands and expectations in advance and now let’s talk.”
China’s style of diplomacy is more nuanced, and telling Blinken to go hell or even to go Tianjin is just not its way. Instead, an innocently wandering balloon gives Blinken a face-saving way to postpone the self-invited visit to China.
Note, he didn’t say he is canceling the visit, just postponing the trip. Despite his harsh, blunt approach, he does understand that the US desperately needs China’s willing collaboration. With China, he needs to act like he understands it can’t be all take and no give.
A note added after the post: Should a real war break out between the U.S. and China, we can expect an armada of ten thousand weather balloons menacing the American sky.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uOYG_n_ypPACqo8vAQNjInmP1XAeeYYb/viewGeorgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-47688233511638860032023-02-02T17:17:00.011-08:002023-02-06T16:45:30.686-08:00Fatal flaws with the idea of decouplingA shorter version of this post first appeared in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/02/why-decoupling-is-a-fatally-flawed-concept/">Asia times</a>.
Recent issue of Bloomberg/Businessweek said, “Despite the heated national security rhetoric in Washington and talk of “decoupling” in policy circles, the world’s top two economies remain firmly intertwined.” The article goes on the say that the bilateral trade for year ending 2022 is likely to be the highest ever recorded.
The failure to decouple is likely good news for China but even better news for the American public. However, anyone with a dollop of common sense would realize that the talk about decoupling was just so much balderdash.
For the sake of introducing clarity to what and how decoupling might actually mean, let us recruit a team of Indians to address the many facets of this “elephant” in the room.
Decouple would mean the opposite of economic integration. Each would have nothing to do with the other. This means Americans would have to stop buying manufactured goods from China. But this is contrary to actual bilateral trade data, wherein despite the added import tariff to the retail price, the American public can’t buy enough products Made in China.
That’s the reality to date. In order for the US not to buy from China, we would have to make these products in America. Former President Donald Trump struck on the brilliant idea of bringing manufacturing back to America. He ordered, cajoled and dangled sweet deals to entice American companies back to the US.
<b>Americans don’t know how anymore</b>
The idea basically flopped for a host of reasons. The making of widgets left the U.S. decades ago, first to the four tigers such as Taiwan and Hongkong and then to mainland China. The basic skill sets needed on the production line hasn’t been seen in America for many decades and could not be replaced overnight on demand.
Some lament that Washington is at fault for not having the vision to craft an industrial policy that would encourage retention of the manufacturing of run of the mill products, such as toys, television, personal computers or mobile phones. Our political leaders, busy getting elected, did not envisiage that making widgets was a necessary precursor step to making increasingly higher valued goods, as China has done.
Actually, most the blame belongs to America’s abiding faith in Capitalism as executed by Wall Street. Not for nothing that Corporate America are known as “multinationals.” Multinationals (MNCs) go to where the production costs are the lowest and sell to where the profit is highest. “National interest” does not figure in their board room discussions.
As Trump’s successor, President Joe Biden lacked the courage to remove the tariffs on imports from China, which could have only benefitted the American consumer. Washington along with the compliant mainstream media has so thoroughly demonized China in the minds of American public that Biden dare not risk even an appearance of apparently acting soft on China.
However, Biden apparently understands that bringing manufacturing back is not quite as simple as a Trumpian clarion call. For one thing, the American wage scale would raise the cost of production, perhaps by as much as 50% according to Morris Chang, founder of Taiwan Semiconductor, for semiconductors. In the case of highend products, production also needs a complete supply chain of parts and components, which would also need to be transplanted from somewhere.
<b>Biden wins at the expense of Europeans</b>
So, instead of counting on American MNCs to make America great again, Biden is dangling subsidies to appeal to foreign MNCs, any company except from China, to move their plants to the US. European companies find the prospects tempting. Their economy at home faces shortages and inflation thanks to the Ukrainian war and they find America’s stability and market appealing.
Just like their American counterparts, European companies owe their allegiance to their shareholders. But enticing European MNCs to the US means taking jobs away from their home country, which is making the European leaders very unhappy, hardly a way to treat America’s allies.
Biden’s another approach is to outright hijack Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) plant from Taiwan and transplant it to Phoenix Arizona. The first group of TSMC staff came willingly and accompanied the equipment disassembled from Taiwan. They were convinced by their own government that invasion from China was imminent and this was the opportunity to get out.
Mere weeks later, some troubling signs are developing. The staff from Taiwan are used to working 10-12 hour shifts and they were promised that they do not have to work night shifts. Well, their American colleagues don’t want to work night shifts either and 8 hours per day is their normal stint.
The difference between the Taiwan based wage scale and the US based also creates tension and resentment. Presumably, the difference would eventually be harmonized but the manufacturing cost would go up.
The question will be whether the TSMC customers, such as Apple et al., would pay for this higher price chips for the sake of national interest or just keep buying from the TSMC plant remaining in Taiwan. Want to hazard a guess?
When the Soviet Union sent aloft the first manmade satellite in 1957, America woke up in shock, and promptly rallied national energy and resources to respond. Twelve years later we sent man to the moon. That was America’s first Sputnik moment.
When China showed that they have caught up or even surpassed the US in certain critical 21st century technogies, that was another Sputnik moment.
<b>Demonize easier than compete</b>
But this time, our leaders in Washington must have decided that rather than compete head on, it was cheaper to allocate a few hundreds of million dollars to the media and ask them to continue to mislead the American public and demonize China as a human rights violator incapable of innovation and technological advances.
Of course, Pentagon has yet to explain how an undersea mountain “ran” into the nose of our most advanced nuclear submarine off southern China coast in 2021 and forcing the sub to surface and run to safety. That’s a juicy mystery still waiting for the mainstream media to investigate and report. Unconfirmed rumor is that a Chinese drone sub wreaked havoc on the USS Connecticut.
When the US has been going around the world promoting armed conflicts in the name of imposing “rule based, international order,” death and destruction inevitably followed. The world witnessed the repeated scenario in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen to name a few hot spots set ablazed by Uncle Sam.
Rather than feeling secured under the American military umbrella, the rest of the world fear and distrust American rhetoric and intentions. In the meantime, China makes the rounds offering Belt and Road Initiative to underdeveloped and developing countries.
The basics of BRI is that the host country will consult with China and select the infrastructure projects that need China’s assistance and financing. Infrastructure projects, such as port, rail, highway, airport, power and others, upon completion would give the host an economic shot in the arm.
Raising the gross domestic product could come from increase in export and participation of global trade, improved yield on the farm based on Chinese technical assistance and creation of new jobs in the cities. BRI becomes a form of incoming tide that raises all boats.
Over 150 countries around the world have signed BRI deals with China. Over time, we can expect to see increasing number of countries grow in economical strength. As more countries manage to keep their own people employed at home, the world will see fewer refugees and migrants, an overall benefit you will not hear reported by the western media.
<b>China has friends, the US fear and loathing</b>
The success of BRI has raised alarm from the western media and American diplomats are going around Africa and Latin America warning them of China’s “debt-trap diplomacy.” China’s BRI financing is normally around half of the going rate, sometimes even at zero interest, and some loans were outright forgiven.
These third world countries should be offended that the West believes they are too stupid to tell the difference between centuries of colonial exploitation they suffered in the hands of the western imperial powers and China’s straightforward business propositions.
If the much talked about decoupling were to suddenly occur tomorrow, the US would pay a much dearer price than would China.
China would continue to be the most important trading partner to every country except for perhaps the US. China has long term, yuan based, energy contracts with Saudi, Iran, Qatar and other Gulf states along with Russia. Furthermore, thanks to the US aggressive actions pushing China and Russia into tighter collaboration, they can roll up their sleeves and concentrate on developing and realizing the vast potential of Siberia.
On the other hand, the US is suffering from a deep deficit of trust by allies and rest of the world alike. The world has seen American unilateralism at work as the US confiscated the foreign reserve of the Taliban government in Afghanistan and later the Russian holdings, national and personal.
The threat of sanctions and actual sanctions imposed has been the US favorite tool of diplomacy. As many have observed, sanctions have unanticipated consequences and blowback. As one recent article concluded, “Western sanctions led Russia to greatly increase trade with Asia, while devastating Europe’s economy. The US tech war against China is damaging its own industry.”
Washington can act arbitrarily, capriciously and unilaterally. That’s why Japan, even as an ally, and China being the two largest foreign holders of US debt are in a rush to divest their holdings as quickly as possible. In the case of China, they face the challenge of trade surplus accumulating faster than they can divest their dollars.
Indeed, friend and foe alike, most countries’ reserve now include increasing portion of China’s yuan while lessening the portion in dollars. Russia has even announced the ultimate goal of holding 60% renminbi and 40% gold as their foreign exchange reserve.
Ironically, in middle of last month, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen flew to Europe just to intercept China’s vice premier Liu He as he was on his way to the Davos summit. Apparently, the gist of their three-hour meeting was for Yellen to pitch the importance of China holding onto the dollars and continuing to buy US debt as vital to supporting the American economy.
Most likely decoupling was not part of their conversation.
https://doc-00-9o-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/5f9ml6jq1th2msvidbi71cudflhi4v1m/4kgu3qe6nc6r55m44ql0ajlh7q5pla55/1675729950000/04384644368551862567/05668267313738172040/1u-M2RJGzQXM5r4pgfYt7rO4IwdD5SdiQ?e=download&authuser=0&nonce=nt9gju73c533u&user=05668267313738172040&hash=5r60ijh8ehmhro9t3b6iv0aj8hjmic8a
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-66693904677653678372023-01-19T20:42:00.001-08:002023-02-06T16:49:54.398-08:002023 bodes poorly for US international relationsFirst posted On <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2023/01/2023-bodes-poorly-for-us-international-relations/">Asia Times</a>.
America’s top diplomat Antony Blinken’s most important task for the new year is to secure a summit meeting between US President Joe Biden and China’s leader, Xi Jinping. The odds of Blinken coming up empty and failing to arrange this meeting are exceedingly high.
The reason is that China is growing weary of repeated cycles of Biden saying one thing and doing just the opposite. As Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is alleged to have said in a telephone conversation with Blinken, “This business of warmly embracing while getting stabbed in the back is getting tiresome.”
As reported by Asia Times from Bali, Biden committed not to interfere with China’s governing structure, not to wage a new cold war with China, not to recruit allies to align against China, and not to promote or support Taiwan independence, nor reject the principle of one China. He also pledged that the US does not intend to initiate military conflict, wage economic warfare, decouple the two economies or hinder China’s economic development.
Any unbiased observer could be forgiven for thinking that after the warm and fuzzy three-hour meeting, Biden would seize the opportunity to take steps to relax the bilateral tension.
He could have rescinded the foolish tariff war initiated by former president Donald Trump and carried on by his own administration. The trade war has worked against American interests, as the trade deficit has continued to grow in China’s favor while tariff-added prices on Chinese imports increased inflationary pressure for the American consumer. But Biden did not.
He could have backed off on the draconian semiconductor embargo he imposed on China, as a gesture of goodwill. He did not.
Biden didn’t mean what he said
Instead, Biden signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which included $10 billion in military aid to Taiwan. This aid is actually in the form of a loan. At $2 billion per year, Biden has placed orders on behalf of Taiwan with America’s weapons makers and has already sent the bill for the interest charges to the Taipei government.
Typical of Washington chicanery, Taipei pays first for a possible future delivery of advanced weapons. Based on past records, Taipei holding an empty bag is not beyond the realm.
After the new year dawned, Washington is also said to be ready to send “observers” to sit in offices inside the Taiwanese government for a stint of up to two years. Of course, observers have a way of becoming advisers and eventually becoming a take-charge shadow government, turning President Tsai Ing-wen’s government into zombies.
Biden has also sent word to Taipei that the period of four-month active duty for conscripted soldiers is too short. President Tsai dutifully ordered a revision of the statute to 12 months commencing in 2024.
Critics in Taiwan jeered at this alleged toughening of military preparedness. They opined that the 12-month training will qualify the young soldiers to carry and fire a rifle but stand no chance in face of advanced firepower, if the People’s Liberation Army were to invade. Getting these young people killed in action, however, would satisfy Washington in getting Taiwan to stand as proxy versus China, just like Ukraine in the proxy war with Russia.
Of course, all the developments related to Taiwan directly contradict the solemn pledges Biden made at the Group of Twenty summit in Bali. There are two takeaways for the world. One is that what American leaders say can’t be trusted; their promises do not equate obligations. Second, the US will act only in itss own self-interest and care not a whit about its allies. Treating Taiwan as a pathetic vassal is just one example.
America’s European allies have already seen the cost of joining the US in supporting the proxy war in Ukraine. While Ukrainians and Russians were expected to be the big losers in the conflict, the Europeans did not expect to become victims of runaway inflation. The rise of inflation was due to the American sanctions on Russia, which retaliated by stopping the flow of gas and oil to the European Union.
The pain of being an American ally
As French President Emmanuel Macron bitterly observed, the Europeans were offered relief with liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the US, but at four times the domestic American prices. Thus while the EU paid through the nose for their energy, the Americans reaped obscene profit. Hardly an ethical or honorable way to treat an ally.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz also saw through the American duplicity and he quickly organized an 11-hour visit to Beijing to meet with Xi Jinping in early November, before the G20. He took along a delegation of senior CEOs to reaffirm and cement the bilateral economic relationship with Germany’s largest trading partner – especially crucial as Europe has to confront rampant, ongoing inflation.
Macron also sees the urgency of building France’s economic ties with China and is busily arranging for a visit by him to be formally added to Xi’s official calendar. It’s hard to know where he is in the queue. Heads of state of Italy, Australia and New Zealand are also jockeying to meet with Xi. They all see economic tie-ups with China in one form or another as a top-priority item on their national agendas.
However, the first to meet Xi in the new year is Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. He arrived in Beijing on Tuesday for a three-day visit. As Asia Times reports, the Philippines is in desperate need for foreign capital investment and just the kind of help with infrastructure building that China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is known for.
Unqualified success of BRI
First proposed by Xi in 2013, the BRI has become China’s signature tool of diplomacy. Close to 150 countries had signed up to become members of the BRI by the end of 2022. Many of the BRI projects involved building transportation corridors via trains or highways and ports and harbors. Such infrastructure projects enabled the host country to join or expand its participation in world trade.
Other projects involved hospitals, libraries and schools. All were designed to help the economy of the host country.
The projects are financed by China at below-market interest rates and even at zero interest in some cases. Chinese companies provide the leadership, management and technology to implement each project.
In the early years, China bore the slings and arrows of criticism from the Western media and from Washington politicians. Now, with hundreds of projects going on around the world, the BRI has become well accepted in much of the developing world. Any Westerner still warning about China’s “debt trap” diplomacy is treated with derision and contempt.
China’s message is easy to understand. It is in favor of open trade and mutually beneficial collaboration. It does not require geopolitical pledges of allegiance or alignment. And it does not wish to argue over who has the correct definition of human rights or democracy, or insist on who is right.
After the 25th People’s Congress in late October, Xi began to meet with other national leaders. Vietnam’s Communist Party chief Nguyen Phu Trong became the first foreign leader to visit Beijing, quickly followed by Germany’s Scholz.
World leaders eager to meet with Xi
Xi then left Beijing for the G20 summit in Bali and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Thailand. Leaders lined up to meet with Xi on the sidelines of both summits, eager to re-establish bilateral relations and explore economic cooperation with the world’s largest trading nation.
President Xi later went on a three-day state visit to Saudi Arabia. In Riyadh, China concluded a US$25 billion deal for oil. The Saudis also hosted an inaugural China-Arab states summit during Xi’s visit, and a meeting with the Gulf Cooperation Council, which comprises Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
On top of China’s 25-year strategic partnership with Iran, China can now claim to being friends with 1.8 billion people of the Islamic world, be they Sunnis or Shiites.
Before the end of calendar year 2022, China also entered a free-trade deal with Ecuador, the fourth such deal in America’s back yard, in addition to Chile, Costa Rica and Peru. Contrary to what the wise old men of the West are telling Washington, world trade and globalization are far from dead but more popular than ever with the countries that are not members of Group of Seven.
For the year of 2023, there are two earth-shaking developments that might catch the US by surprise.
One is the possible routine use of the petro-renminbi as means of payment for energy from the Middle East. The internationalization of the yuan has been a gradual process and Washington could easily be caught off guard, like a frog in a steamer. The total replacement of the petrodollar is not likely in 2023 but the renminbi inroad could give Washington a real nightmare to worry about.
A grand collaboration in Siberia
A doozy of a deal in the offing is the ongoing discussion between Russia and China for a grand collaboration involving Siberia. As discussed in Asia Times, American sanctions and pressure on Russia have forced President Vladimir Putin to deepen his alliance and dependence on China.
Historically, Russia has always been leery of opening Siberia for Chinese investment for fear of losing control of the territory owing to the potential of an overflowing Chinese population that could flood the frozen tundra region. Now Putin is in desperate need to realize the full potential of 40% of the landmass currently in permafrost hibernation.
According to Russia media, the deal on the table would involve China investing $160 billion on 79 projects. The projects would not just include extracting oil, gas and minerals but would also cover infrastructure, agriculture, automotive, machinery and communications. China has the money, technology, know-how and most crucially, the hardy and hard-working people to make it happen. Russia needs the economic development that comes from industries.
Now, figuratively speaking, while Blinken is sitting in the reception room waiting to be summoned to discuss another Biden-Xi summit, he has to be prepared to answer two likely questions from Qin Gang, the newly appointed Chinese foreign minister. What’s the point of another summit? What is there to talk about?
Virtually all national leaders have been invited to meet with Xi in Beijing. A subtle snub would be for Xi to offer to meet with Biden in Xiamen. Other than not being Beijing, Xiamen has a lot of subtle symbolism. From Xiamen, one can see Kinmen, an island that belongs to the Taipei government. Xiamen is warm and scenic and maybe Biden won’t care. He might think he has been transported to the Caribbean.
Of course, Biden could also return the compliment and offer to host the return summit in Taipei. After all, the US already owns that city and the government there.
Critical_Hour_1142_seg_3.mp3Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-13354618957129283162022-12-12T18:01:00.002-08:002022-12-12T18:01:26.058-08:00Comments by Professor Ling-chi Wang on contrasting styles of diplomacyMy friend, Prof Ling-chi Wang wrote a thoughtful response to my op-ed that I would like to share on my blog.
BTW, he and I grew up on Gulangyu, the same tiny islet in the Xiamen harbor, and went to the same elementary school at the same time but we did not actually meet until many years later in San Francisco.
==============================================
Thanks, again, for your insightful piece! What a contrast in leadership styles and management of diplomacy!
Xi Jinping has been a masterful strategist in handling both domestic and foreign affairs. The ideologically driven Western media, commentators, and politicians have been completely wrong in criticizing Xi for his alleged assertiveness in dealing dealing with the West since day one of his presidency without basis, calling him a “Chinese Emperor” (On the cover of The Economist) and a ruthless dictator, suppressing dissidents and slaming China’s door to eager foreign investors and businesses in China since 2013. (Evidence points to the opposite).
I think Xi has been quite low-key and patient in handling affairs at home and abroad in the last ten years, adhering to the precept of Deng Xiaoping, 韬光养晦, until the historic meeting between Yang Jiechi and Tony Blinken on March 18, 2021 in Alaska and now, in full display in the first two weeks of December 2022. Sparing no effort in saving lives in China, he mobilized the nation and the people in a war against the pandemic in the last three years, even as he quietly, steadily, and methodically lay the foundation of his policies, based on his vision of China's dream and renaissance and his Belt and Road Initiative in international relations he put forward since the beginning of his presidency. Eliminating abject poverty being one of his most successful goal.
Your article offers the starkest contrast between the leadership of Xi Jinping and the leadership of Barach Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, even though the three U.S. presidents have very different styles in running the U.S. They actually have more important similarities among them than differences. Among the similarities is the commitment to maintain U.S. global hegemony at all costs at home and abroad by any means necessary. Even if the government is dysfunctional and totally paralyzed by mean-spirted division, what is keeping the government and the U.S. economy from collapsing is the shared interest in keeping the U.S. on top of the world and making sure the rest of the world, including our European allies, stay in line and remain subservient to American needs and interests. We absolutely refuse to look critically into ourselves, our system of government, our ideology and values. Instead, we only want to use foreign government, China, as a scapegoat and use it to unite the nation to blaming China for other our own failures.
We declared China as an existential threat to our security, interests and prosperity without empirical basis. China is Branded as our No. 1 Enemy, just like what we declared in the 1950s and 1960s to justify our total embargo of China and we entered the Wars in Korea and In Vietnam to stop Chinese expansionism and against our own so-called values, we provided military and financial aids, at the expense of our own needs at home, for military dictators or our compliant regimes who were willing to sacrifice the needs of their people for our interests.
Let me pose this question: If we blame and hate China and the Chinese people so much, why don’t we try to throw out everything within our households that are “Made in China” and see how long we can survive each day without them. We need China for "our daily bread!” just like what we say each time we say “The Lord’s Prayer.” The sad truth is we don’t even want to acknowledge that every American needs China for everything we need for our daily living.
What we witnessed during the first two weeks of December 2022 is an impressive display of President Xi's orchestration of China's diplomacy without using military, economic, and political threat. What he has accomplished in diplomacy in the last two weeks is a game-changer and historic. But, mark my words, his diplomacy will soon be branded as Xi’s new assertiveness in international relations. This is diplomacy as it should be: he is very confident, thoughtful, polite, and strategic against the backdrop of a risky new phase of China’s handling of not just the pandemic now in its fourth year but also a national mobilization to address the economic slow down and people’s well beings since 2020. He engaged leaders of countries in ASEAN, G-20, Saudi Arabia, six Gulf states, and more than a dozen of Arab states in Asia and across north Africa under very friendly and cordial atmosphere without coercion or threat, the style came to be closely associated with President Biden. Even his European allies find it offensive and selfish. Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-33385925563791996902022-12-12T17:56:00.002-08:002022-12-12T17:56:52.222-08:00World sees contrasting styles in diplomacyFirst posted on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/12/world-sees-contrasting-styles-in-diplomacy/">Asia Times</a>.
After the US midterm election last month, I suggested that voters have yet to pass judgment on the current administration’s dismal foreign policy. Recent developments indicate that President Joe Biden’s policy will continue to assert the rights that belong to the hegemon of the world.
After the election, Biden met with Chinese president Xi Jinping on the sidelines of Group of Twenty summit in Bali, a major international event. There the two leaders enjoyed a more than three-hour heart-to-heart chat and exchange of views.
The Chinese side took careful minutes of the meeting and posted a summary of what Biden had said. The American side weren’t such careful note-takers but posted no disagreements to the Chinese summary.
Biden basically doubled down on the US commitment not to interfere with China’s governing structure, not to wage a new cold war with China, not to recruit allies to align against China, not to promote or support Taiwan independence, nor reject the principle of one China.
In addition, he said, the US does not intend to initiate military conflict, wage economic warfare, decouple the two economies or hinder China’s economic development.
Spirit of Bali did not last long
Xi expressed satisfaction with the American position, with the added hope that Biden’s lieutenants would act in accordance and consistent with the commitments expressed at this meeting by President Biden.
Alas, the white man again spoke with a forked tongue. No sooner had Biden hurried back to attend his granddaughter’s White House wedding that his team began anew to tear China down.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, albeit not a white man, is a recent example picking up the cudgel to bash China. His plea to Congress to justify mega-billion-dollar allocations for defense is that such massive spending was needed to mount effective deterrence to China.
Deterrence for what? China does not have military bases around the world like Uncle Sam has. China does not have naval flotillas sailing around every sea and ocean; Uncle Sam has. China does have a marine fighting force, but about one-hundredth the size of Uncle Sam’s. Who’s threatening whom, anyway?
An example of the upside-down logic is Austin’s quote the Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “war is not the result of NATO expansion, it is the cause of NATO expansion.” Most readers know well, as should the American people, that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been pushing eastward toward Russia for decades, and Russia’s Ukrainian invasion only began in February.
By way of the same (il)logic, the US must deter the threat of China because we Americans have decided that China is a threat. How dare China develop countermeasures to our advance weaponry and deprive our right to shock and awe? Their action is a threat to our security. Our only alternative is to keep ramping up our defense budget.
Consequentially, the bipartisan House of Representaives just enacted an allocation of $858 billion for the military. That’s $45 billion more than Biden even asked for. What’s a few more billions here and there? Washington wants to make sure that America feels secure enough to sleep at night.
World lines up to be China’s friends
In the meantime, the rest of the world has been watching Biden’s fumbling diplomacy and concluded that when the Americans draw a line in the sand, it doesn’t mean anything. But if Biden can profess to make nice with China, as he did in Bali, so can the rest of the world.
Thus Qatar has just entered a 27-year contract to supply liquefied natural gas to China, which means that from now on Qatar can only offer occasional spot-market sales, if any, to the energy-hungry European Union.
Xi Jinping has just concluded a full-scale, three-day state visit to Saudi Arabia. He was accorded all the pomp and circumstance heretofore reserved for Riyadh’s most important ally, the US. But when Biden flew all the way to Saudi recently, he was greeted with a cursory fist bump.
More important, Biden was humiliated when OPEC+, led by Saudi, ignored his request to increase oil output in order to cut the price of oil and ease inflationary pressure in the US. Instead, Saudi did just the opposite and cut production.
Saudi provides China energy security
While in Riyadh, Xi concluded a comprehensive strategic partnership cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia. Part of the agreement included reaffirmation that Taiwan is part of China and that both parties pledge non-interference in the domestic affairs of the other. These provisions were for the benefit of the US watching on the sidelines.
Bilateral trade, in rough balance between China and Saudi Arabia, was worth $87.3 billion in 2021, nearly 34% up from the previous year. Xi noted that China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a perfect complement to help the Saudis realize their Vision 2030 goals. One immediate effect is Saudi’s engagement with Huawei to help build a smart city.
Xi also finalized a $25 billion deal for oil, and suggested the replacement of the petrodollar with the renminbi for payment. The demotion of the dollar would be explosive news, and both Beijing and Riyadh may have elected to keep quiet on what would be the beginning of the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.
The best face The Wall Street Journal could put on the Riyadh summit was to say, “China hasn’t yet demonstrated interest or ability in supplanting the US’s broad role in the Middle East, and the Saudis don’t really want to replace the US as their main security guarantor, analysts say.” I would say that’s a classic attempt to put lipstick on the pig.
Riyadh also hosted a summit meeting of the Gulf state leaders, with Xi on expanding cooperation on not just energy but trade and infrastructure building. As the World Cup in Qatar has amply shown, the world-class venues for that soccer tournament and supporting infrastructure were built by Chinese companies.
The Arab Gulf states have plenty of money but need the infrastructure to help them turn to other avenues of economic development and diversify from oil. China is more than happy to supply that need. And China does not require geopolitical allegiances nor demand access to military bases.
In addition to the Gulf states, leaders of Egypt, Tunisia, Iraq, Morocco, Algeria and others were at the Riyadh summit. Coupled with China’s existing 25-year strategic partnership agreement with Iran, China can count on the 1.8 billion people of the Islamic world as friends.
The West alleging debt traps from Belt and Road financing by China is increasingly ringing hollow and is ignored by most of the world longing for the mutually beneficial relationships that China offers.
Aligned with China through BRICS, SCO
Other large countries that than Group of Seven allies of the US are lining up to join BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). All it takes to join is an invitation, and there are no dues for membership.
BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The purpose of the organization is to promote peace, security, development and cooperation. A long list of nations has express interest in joining or have formally applied to become members.
Among them, Saudi Arabia sees the group as important customers for its oil. Turkey, as a member of NATO, sees BRICS as a geopolitical hedge between the West and the rest of the world while addinc another tie with China.
The SCO was organized to counter the West. Its membership included China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Later, India and Pakistan were added. Iran has become the latest member.
Neither the SCO nor BRICS encompass military alliances but are in solidarity against hegemony and unilateralism – meaning the US. The fact that adversarial states, such as India and Pakistan and Iran and Saudi, can share common ground and belong to the same organizations is a hopeful vector for world peace.
Much of the world outside the West does not see any benefit from being aligned with the US, just living with the fear that goes with sleeping with a tiger. Even some allies are seeing the downside of having to face the whims of American hegemony.
Unilateralism and Biden
ASML, based in the Netherlands, is openly challenging the White House sanction against selling photolithographic machines to China. ASML is the world’s leading maker of the multimillion-dollar etching machines necessary for making semiconductor chips. China is its most important customer, and not selling to China is to commit corporate suicide.
Samsung has invested heavily on semiconductor plants in China making chips for customers inside China. Samsung, possibly with the help of the South Korean government, is also trying find some dispensation to wriggle out from under Washington’s ban.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is the most hapless victim of the undeclared chips war. It is known to have the most advanced fabrication process and is recognized as the leader in making the most advanced chips for the world.
For this reason, Washington considers TSMC being located in Taiwan as a risk to US national security.
Consequently, TSMC has been coerced into disassembling its fab processing line from Taiwan and shipping it to Arizona along with a technical and management team.
In addition, if Taiwan should face imminent invasion by the mainland’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the US with the tacit acceptance of the Taipei government would likely plant explosives to destroy the TSMC facilities remaining in Taiwan.
Overlooked in this revelation are several noteworthy conclusions. The US government does not own any part of TSMC but has no compunction about blowing its facilities into smithereens in the name of guarding national security – of America, of course.
Moving to Arizona and planning the destruction of TSMC properties remaining in Taiwan is to admit that the US cannot defend Taiwan against the PLA. Obviously, the fate of 24 million people living in Taiwan is of no concern to Washington.
Furthermore, moving technicians and management lock, stock and barrel from Taiwan is admission that the US no longer has the skillset and capability to run state-of-the-art semiconductor fabs.
Morris Chang, the retired founder of TSMC, was mostly on the mark on another occasion when he said that production costs in the US would be at least 50% higher than in Taiwan. Certainly not good news for tamping down inflationary pressure.
But at the ribbon-cutting ceremony in Arizona to mark the arrival of TSMC equipment, Chang backed off somewhat by saying the 50%-higher operating cost was when TSMC first tried to operate a fab in Oregon more than 20 years ago.
Oregon never became an economically appealing base to expand the company’s presence in the US. Now, he seemed to imply, Phoenix will be different because of past lessons learned.
Biden celebrates return of US manufacturing
Biden spoke at the ceremony and declared the “return of American manufacturing.” Perhaps he was thinking of Chang being an American citizen, or he was thinking of the first group of 300 from Taiwan who will be given instant green cards (permanent resident certificants) and become bona fide Americans. Or, maybe he was simply delighted with the success of the “grab and go” caper.
And consistent with Biden’s claim, somebody had better brief the Federal Bureau of Imvestigation in full, so as not to trigger arrests of suspicious-looking Asian faces walking around Phoenix. These are newly arrived “Americans” and not spies from China.
Joining the celebration were other luminaries such as Apple chief executive officer Robin Cook, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and AMD CEO Lisa Su. To the surprise of no one, they all gushed about the prospects of having a first-class fab as their supplier in their back yard.
Time will tell if the transformation of TSMC into “USSMC” will become a real success or simply be another lip gloss on the pig.
We can see that Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen is no Volodymyr Zelensky. The president of Ukraine constantly asks Biden for more billions to stay in the fight against Russia. Tsai doesn’t ask for any funds, she just lies down and willingly gives away Taiwan’s crown jewel to please her American master.
China builds friendship around the world. The US gets along by strong-arming those considered to be its allies on the unilateral principle that it’s all for the good of America. To no one’s surprise, the number of friends is dwindling.
Perhaps it’s time that the Biden administration listens to a commentator at The Harvard Crimson who is no fan of China: “It’s time Americans stop throwing pity parties and give up on trying to regain bygone dominance. Instead, we should chart a new course of bilateral cooperation between the US and China, one founded on cultural exchange and the free flow of information.”
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-78408629581902631242022-11-29T21:35:00.010-08:002022-11-29T21:40:35.567-08:00Chinese-American completes ‘long journey’ to justice - But does Sherry Chen’s legal victory signal the end of racial profiling by US authorities?First posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/11/chinese-american-completes-long-journey-to-justice/">Asia Times</a>.
Sherry Chen threw a party last weekend to celebrate her legal victory over her former employer, the US Department of Commerce (DOC). The purpose of the party, Chen said, was to thank her many loyal supporters for standing with her throughout her “long journey seeking justice.”
The celebration took place at a home in Palo Alto, California, belonging to Adrian and Monica Yeung Arima, where Chen was staying as their houseguest. Silicon Valley was where many of her supporters reside who donated to her legal defense fund and gave abiding moral support. Around a hundred attended the party.
Long ordeal begins
In October 2014, after a two-year investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation came to her workplace and took her away in handcuffs, to the shock and surprise of her colleagues. In March 2015, federal prosecutors dropped all charges without any explanation. That should have been the end of the Sherry Chen story, but it wasn’t.
Amazingly, in March 2016, Chen, a hydrologist, was fired from her job with the National Weather Service (NWS) based on the same charges that had been discarded by the prosecutors. NWS is under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Asia Times described the twisted shenanigan that took place between the NWS and NOAA in order to formalize the paperwork for Chen’s dismissal – hint, the head of NWS wriggled and managed to stay out of the fray.
Shocked by the development, she said to Asia Times, “Why do I have to accept the unfair and unjust treatment my government has given me? I am not just fighting for myself but for all victims of racial profiling so that it won’t happen again.”
MSPB rules in her favor
Chen then filed a complaint for wrongful termination with the Merit System Protection Board. The MSPB was established to protect federal workers against abuses by their employers. To the surprise of many, the chief administrative judge, Michele Schroeder, ruled in her favor as the victim of gross injustice.
From the time she filed with the MSPB to reaching the verdict took one and a half years. Judge Schroeder order reinstatement with back pay and benefits. Historically, the odds of winning a ruling from the MSPB against the federal government had been less than one in a hundred. So, in April 2018, the verdict should have been the end of Chen’s journey and a cause for celebration.
But it wasn’t, because the DOC filed an appeal, which needed to be heard by a quorum of two or more judges. At the time the MSPB had only one working judge, and therefore the appeal was sent into limbo. Was the DOC aware of the delay due to a technicality? Of course.
On January 2019, Chen filed a civil lawsuit against the DOC alleging malicious prosecution and false arrest and sought $5 million for damages and compensation. In October 2021, the American Civil Liberties Union along with Cooley LLP, a major law firm headquartered in Palo Alto, joined her legal team in pursuing the suit.
Finally, early this month, Chen along with ACLU announced a settlement that would pay her $550,000 and an annuity of $125,000 per year over the next 10 years. Thus she can claim a happy ending after a decade-long journey.
“It’s an enormous victory for Ms Chen personally,” said Ashley Gorski, a senior staff lawyer with the ACLU National Security Project, “and for the Chinese-American community as well. The settlement makes clear that when the government discriminates, it’s going to be held accountable.”
ACLU proclaims Chen’s win historic
The ACLU called her settlement historic, unprecedented and the largest ever paid by the DOC. All true, but Chen’s win, in my view, just recovers her legal fees and back wages. And her case is just a beginning of possible rectification and does not signify the end of systemic racial profiling against Chinese-Americans by the US government.
As I observed in 2015, “Rather than compiling evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, the FBI and fellow practitioners will jump at any flimsy thread of possible wrong doing, make a public arrest, send out a press release on their accusation and put the hapless Chinese American in detention.
“When their findings are then subject to scrutiny and fail to pass muster, the charges are quietly dropped. By then, of course, the reputation of the person is in tatters and the victim’s life and finances are in ruin.”
Since the celebrated Wen Ho Lee case and even earlier, to this day, Chinese-American scientists are considered guilty until proven innocent. The burden of proof is on the accused. In Sherry Chen’s case, even when proven innocent, the burden was still on her to fight for the justice that was her due.
According to an article published last December by the MIT Technology Review, analyzing the so-called China Initiative launched by former US president Donald Trump, “To date, only about a quarter of defendants charged under the initiative have been convicted, and about half of those defendants with open charges have yet to see the inside of an American courtroom.”
The remaining 25%, I surmise, had their charges quietly dismissed.
Xiaoxing Xi also seeking justice
In 2015, Xiaoxing Xi, professor of physics at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was arrested at gunpoint at his home in front of his wife and daughters by the FBI in a “daring” dawn raid.
The DOJ subsequently dropped the charges, which could be considered a win for Xi because the department did not ask him to plead guilty to some minor misdemeanor in exchange. The government just hates to admit making an error, and will normally ask for a plea to some minor offense so the arrest can be scored in the win column.
Wen Ho Lee, for example, had to plead guilty to downloading computer files in violation of regulations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory before obtaining release from nine months of solitary confinement and set free by the presiding judge. The judge expressed regret that Lee had to cop a plea and apologized to him for government’s gross misconduct.
Many other Chinese-Americans victimized by the FBI and DOJ have had to plea-bargain so that they can go on with their lives and cut the financial bleeding from the legal fees. It’s always a challenge to take on the US government in a legal dispute. Compared with the individual, the government has infinite resources and time on their side.
Like Sherry Chen did, Professor Xi is also suing the US government and FBI agents for knowingly misrepresenting evidence as the basis for his arrest and the consequent trauma he suffered. The ACLU is also part of his legal team and he is hoping for an eventually favorable ruling.
Gang Chen, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), appeared in a panel discussion along with Sherry Chen and Dr Xi at a conference in San Francisco, held a day after Chen’s legal victory was announced. The subject was racial profiling and discrimination against Chinese-American scientists.
The fourth speaker was Jeremy Wu, founder of APA Justice, responsible for diligently tracking the government’s judiciary abuses.
Gang Chen has similar FBI encounter
Professor Chen was more fortunate than his fellow panelists. According to The New York Times, as soon as he found that he was under investigation, his employer, MIT, hired outside legal counsel to advise him along the way.
One early morning in January 2021, a gang of more than 10 FBI agents came to his home to handcuff him and take him away for interrogation. He was released that afternoon, but he had to stay away from the campus and make no contact with any MIT employees.
That September, Professor Chen’s lawyer reported good news from the prosecutor’s office. If Chen would admit to having certain contacts in China, the charges would be dismissed and the case dropped. While his lawyer thought the offer was a safe, risk-free deal to get off, Chen refused. Since he had done nothing wrong, he did not think he had to make the deal.
A full year later, in January 2022, all charges against Professor Chen were dropped and he resumed his work at MIT. He was more fortunate than most because Rafael Reif, then president of MIT, supported him from the inception of the government investigation and the school pick up his legal bill. His fellow faculty vigorously rallied to his defense and protested his innocence.
Others in similar debacles have been much worse off. Their university employers quickly cut them loose and hung them out to dry. By the time the charges are dropped, they may or may not be reinstated, their reputations have been tainted and their bank accounts greatly depleted by the fees for legal defense.
At least 1,400 US-based ethnic Chinese scientists switched their affiliation last year from American to Chinese institutions, according to a joint report by academics from Harvard, Princeton and MIT.
The trend is increasing thanks to the China Initiative established by Donald Trump and only recently canceled by President Joe Biden. The original intent of the initiative was to curb exchange of scientific informative between the US and China. It turned into a witch-hunt that ran amok.
For ethnic Chinese, working in science and technology in the US has become hazardous, risking out-of-the-blue arrests and third-degree grilling about one’s loyalty. The way to stop the brain drain from the US is to enact regulations and laws that will punish prosecutions based on lies, falsified evidence, and hiding exculpable evidence.
Anti-Chinese hate crimes must not be tolerated, especially when the perpetrator is the government. Provisions need to be in place for victims of wrongful prosecution to be promptly compensated for damages and legal fees. Only then can a brain drain of Chinese scientists and researchers slow – and perhaps reverse.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-2207447486787499722022-11-23T19:50:00.000-08:002022-11-23T19:50:13.984-08:00Biden’s next two years look bleak - The Democratic Party has survived, but the White House remains mired in a failed foreign policyFirst posted on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/11/bidens-next-two-years-look-bleak/">Asia Times</a>.
Despite going into the midterm elections with under 40% popular approval, US President Joe Biden appears to have survived the outcome, avoiding the mortal wound historically associated with a lame duck in the White House.
Bill Clinton, a rare US president who presided over a budget surplus, once embraced an adviser’s mantra “It’s the economy, stupid.” Biden does not seem be graded by his grasp of the economy.
Fortunately for Biden, foreign policy does not normally figure in American voters’ thinking. The Biden team has run around the world busily trying to shore up the American position as the hegemon of the world. Drawing from the lessons of the ignominious retreat from Afghanistan after a 20-year debacle, Biden’s new strategy was to assert authority by initiating proxy wars – in other words, getting somebody else to do the fighting.
He was successful in provoking Russia into invading Ukraine and supplying more than $40 billion worth of arms to Kiev to fight to the last Ukrainian standing. Uncle Sam’s EU allies dutifully supported Washington and castigated Russian President Vladimir Putin for his aggression.
EU suffers as Russia sanctions backfired
Initially, the European Union supported the sanctions imposed by the Biden administration. Then Putin changed the rules of the game by demanding payment in rubles for Russia’s oil and natural gas. The net effect was a ruble that strengthened against the euro and dollar. And the EU countries got to pay through the nose for their energy.
Then the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines from Russia were “mysteriously” blown up by a blatant act of sabotage. Severing the pipelines supplying Russian gas to Germany and others in Europe erases any basis of reconciliation with Russia, so Washington thought.
Rather than letting European allies face a freezing winter, the US rushed to the rescue by selling Texas crude and liquefied natural gas (LNG) at high prices. Yes, very profitable for the US but not so good for the Europeans, feeding their mounting resentment toward Uncle Sam.
Leaders of Germany and France are beginning to question the wisdom of blindly following Washington. They are beginning to see that the so-called “rule-based international order” is nothing more than rules for placing orders for American oil.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz quickly led a delegation to Beijing shortly after the adjournment of the 20th People’s Congress. One significant outcome of his one-day visit was a joint declaration with President Xi Jinping that the two countries will promote a multipolar world and disavow any attempt at decoupling – a clear rejection of Biden’s foreign policy.
Scholz was also handed a $17 billion order for Airbus passenger jets and acceptance of BioNTech Covid vaccines for use in China. The business leaders in the German delegation also announced intentions to increase their investments in China. These are clear indications that both countries recognize the importance of their economic partnership.
Germany is just the latest American ally to realize that dutifully lining up behind Uncle Sam merely exposes them to a full dose of flatulence and not much else.
Saudi Arabia says get lost
To help tamp down inflation, Biden asked Saudi Arabia to increase oil output so as to reduce the prices at America’s gasoline pumps and lessen the pain of taxpayers. Saudi promptly did the opposite by cutting oil production. In less polite circles, we would call that a middle-finger salute.
In fact, Saudi Arabia shows no fealty to the US but is applying to join BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), in both of which China plays a leading role. Riyadh is also finalizing arrangements to sell oil to China for yuan instead of petrodollars.
Iran along with India and Pakistan are already members of the SCO. Others including Turkey, Belarus and Egypt are waiting to join. The organization promotes cooperation and collaboration for mutual benefit and geopolitical tension and rivalry is left outside the door.
Military alliances and confrontations are specifically excluded in the charter of the organization. That India and Pakistan can belong in the same organization is proof. That Saudi Arabia would join with Iran perhaps presages a more amicable future between those two states.
Unlike being aligned with the US, collaborating with China has no downside. No need to host bases for the American troops, and the resultant indignities that, for example, civilians in South Korea and Okinawa have to endure.
Turning his attention to China, Biden has his double-talk down pat. According to the one-China principle, Taiwan is part of China, and the US stands by that. On the other hand, it will train the Taiwanese people how to fight, give them more and better weapons and a promise to send American troops to defend Taiwan. For now, let us defer the ramifications of this issue for another day.
Biden turns to China
In the meantime, despite protestations that the US and China can collaborate in important issues, Biden has gone all-in to wage a full-blown chips war against China. His edicts are intended to effect a total shutdown of trade, exchanges and any sort of transactions involving semiconductor products and technology between the West and China.
The desired outcome is to kneecap China’s semiconductor development. However, the Silicon Valley giants such as Applied Materials and Lam Research are among the first companies to be kneecapped. More than 30% their sales go to China only 8% in the US. Their American employees in China are put on hold and layoffs are beginning in the US.
Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) can no longer sell their most advanced chips to China for artificial-intelligence development. These advanced chips represent these companies’ most important comparative advantage and will mean lost sales in the hundreds of millions. Lost sales are opportunity costs that do not return. The total drop in market cap for the entire industry worldwide is around US$1.5 trillion.
ASML of the Netherlands has virtually a world monopoly on lithographic machines necessary to transfer chip design into actual chips. The company is struggling with not being able to sell not only the most advanced generation but even the older-generation machines to China. These machines go for hundreds of million dollars, and the Biden White House is asking the Dutch company to sit on its hands.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Korean companies and Japanese companies are similarly requested by Biden to kneecap themselves for the greater good of keeping China’s chip industry stunted. Apparently, American companies are forced to comply by law, but the non-American companies are stalling in their compliance.
As Asia Times has pointed out, “the [US] Commerce Department’s specifications show ignorance about the technologies involved and confusion – if not duplicity – about the ban’s implications for China’s military. The experts’ group concluded that the new policy was rushed into effect in panic mode, without weighing its civilian or military implications.”
In other words, the embargo order was hastily and sloppily written and leaves plenty of holes and ambiguity for further arguments and negotiations for exceptions. The chips clampdown is supposedly based on security grounds, but American commercial interests will take a major hit as a consequence.
The semiconductor embargo has forced China to work around the American chokeholds. Contrary to Washington’s perception, the Chinese won’t catch up by just copying and replicating silicon-based American technology.
For example, they have been working on gallium arsenide as the substrate for photonic chips that will operate 1,000 times as fast at 1% of the power consumption – which is important for military uses and does not rely on economies of scale essential in commercial applications.
What will be the eventual outcome? Companies in the West will be crippled by the decoupling and play in a market smaller than the formerly globalized market. New companies in China will dominate in a market centered on China. The sum of both markets is likely to be less than the total market today. This is a classic lose-lose outcome.
The joke is on Washington
It is hard for us Americans to know if our political leaders are just joshing or are seriously misinformed about China. Washington seems to see China as a mere copycat that depends on intellectual-property (IP) theft to compete with America.
In certain technologies, China has at least caught up to the US, if not already surpassing it. To name a few: fifth generation to 6G in telecommunications, superior accuracy of Beidou over America’s Global Positioning System (GPS), exploration missions to Mars and the dark side of the moon, Tiangong soon to be the only space station circling Earth, quantum computing and hypersonic glide missiles.
And oh yes, China has a network of thousands of kilometers of high-speed rail. The US? Zero.
Readers might be amused to know that former US congressman Frank Wolf, who had control of annual funding for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), specifically demanded the exclusion of China from participating in the International Space Station that was jointly operated with the Soviet Union. Now the US is complaining that all the writing in Tiangong is in Chinese, even though NASA has yet to be invited to visit.
According a recent joint report from Harvard, Princeton and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), at least 1,400 US-based ethnic Chinese scientists and academicians have left the US in direct response to the notorious “China Initiative,” and the departures continue to increase.
They have been intimidated and terrorized by random arrests and prosecution that leaves them traumatized, reputation destroyed and financially ruined. Our Department of (in)Justice does not apologize for wrongful prosecution nor offer compensation for damages. This self-inflicted injury will be America’s loss and China’s gain.
The good news is that some Chinese are coming to the US. According to Bloomberg News, Tesla is sending production personnel, automation and control engineers from China to its plant in Fremont, California, in order to “reproduce the success of the Tesla factory in Shanghai.”
Another way of saying “be careful of what you wish for” is to quote Rafael Reif, outgoing president of MIT: “If all we do in response to China’s ambition is to try to double-lock all our doors, I believe we will lock ourselves into mediocrity.”
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-20603520148208714082022-10-22T21:06:00.002-07:002022-10-22T21:06:17.411-07:00G20 to showcase China’s high-speed rail - Jakarta and Beijing plan to demonstrate their partnership in making transportation more efficientFirst posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/10/g20-to-showcase-chinas-high-speed-rail/">Asia Times</a>.
More than 1,300 journalists have already registered to cover the Group of Twenty summit to be held on November 15 and 16 in Bali.
The pre-summit buzz seems to be focusing on such questions as: Will US President Joe Biden attend? If he does, will he meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin? If they meet, will Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky be invited to sit in? If so, will there be any substantive outcome? So on and so forth.
The Western media missed mentioning an unprecedented event that will take place at the G20. Indonesian President Joko Widodo, widely known as Jokowi, will be taking his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping for a ride on Indonesia’s first bullet train.
Taking Xi for a ride
The short ride around Bandung in West Java will be a test run at a more leisurely pace than the train’s designed speed of 350km/h. Full commercial operation after the shakedown of the high-speed railway (HSR) is expected to begin in June 2023.
By then, the travel time from Jakarta, the national capital, to Bandung, the capital of West Java, will shorten from more than three hours to 40 minutes. The 142.5-kilometer linkage is the first phase. The second phase at a distance of 520km will extend the HSR from Bandung to Surabaya and will begin later in 2023.
When completed, the HSR will in essence run the length of Java, the most populated island of Indonesia. Kereta Cepat Indonesia China will own and operate the HSR. KCIC is a joint venture, 60% owned by Indonesia and 40% by China.
In 2008, Japan first proposed the high-speed rail project connecting Jakarta to Surabaya. After a lot of back-and-forth wrestling over the required financial investment, Indonesia finally decided to take a serious look at the project in 2015. To Japan’s surprise, out of the blue, China submitted the winning bid.
Since the global financial crisis of 2008, China had been busy investing in infrastructure. By 2015, China had become the owner of the world’s largest network of high-speed railways.
China used its experience and, ahem, track record to qualify for the Indonesia bid. Widodo went to Japan and China to compare the two HSR systems for himself.
Not only has China’s system exceeded Japan’s Shinkansen in performance, but China’s proposal included technology transfer and willingness to assume of cost overruns. Japan would not commit to either.
China ready to build HSR anywhere
Taiwan-based commentator Lai Yueqian (赖岳谦) has explained why this G20 showcasing is a highly significant development. The test ride is Beijing’s way of announcing to the world that China is ready to market and build HSR anywhere in the world and Indonesia is China’s partner in this venture.
Lai has advanced degrees in international relations from France. He foresees that the KCIC-owned HSR could extend north from Jakarta to Singapore, through Malaysia and Thailand into China and link up with China’s own HSR to become part of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to Central Asia and beyond.
G20 members account for 85% of the world’s gross domestic product, 75% of international trade and two-thirds of the world’s population. There is no more ideal venue than the leaders’ summit for the host country, Indonesia, and China to unveil their intentions to contribute to global trade by building transportation infrastructure around the world.
When China first began to consider building an HSR network to cover its vast territory, it approached Japan and France and proposed a 50/50 joint venture that would include their technical assistance. Those two countries had been up to then the only sources of HSR technology.
Both refused the deal that would include technology transfer and both assumed that China could not go it alone. Instead, China has since built HSR through mountains, deserts, over open waters, high altitudes and permafrost and proves that it can go anywhere.
The railcars are being supplied by China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation (CRRC) in adherence to their specifications for the Fuxing railcars; Fuxing represents China’s highest level of HSR technology.
China to share HSR technology
These cars feature advanced smart technology, safety protocols, and strong environmental adaptability. Called electric multiple units (EMUs), the cars are equipped with 2,500 monitoring points for timely detection, early warning and diagnoses of all key systems.
As reported by Straits Times, “The Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway will enrich the development of infrastructure facilities and generate fresh growth points in both the services sector and trade in services in Indonesia and Southeast Asia.”
The Biden administration and cohorts in Washington favoring confrontation with China are likely to be oblivious to the implications of China’s success in HSR.
Earlier this month, I suggested that sanctions on sales of semiconductor devices and equipment to China is rule-based disorder. Since then, Biden has doubled down and imposed virtually a total ban on semiconductor trade with China.
Speculations are rife in Taiwan that should China decide to invade the island in response to the American chokehold, the US military has contingency plans to hustle key technical and management staff of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) on to a plane and fly them out to Arizona. Mind you, this is based on American assumptions, not on any evidence of China’s actual intentions.
In effect, Biden’s chip ban will disrupt and damage a safe, secure and booming global semiconductor industry and turn it into tatters and pieces.
American producers from process equipment to design software systems to advanced devices will all suffer drastic reduction in revenue and potentially fatal loss of funds to develop the next generation of advances.
As with HSR, China will eventually succeed in circumventing America’s ban on semiconductor trade. Then Washington will experience a “see I told you so,” self-fulfilling confirmation that China poses a threat to America’s security.
In the meantime, Saudi Arabia has told Biden to “get lost” by cutting oil production instead of increasing output as he requested. Biden’s diplomatic response is to decide which cudgel to use on the Saudis. Talk about how to lose friends and piss off people.
The United Arab Emirates has also followed Saudi Arabia’s footsteps by becoming China’s second-largest (after Saudi) economic partner in the Middle East. China’s COSCO Shipping has chosen Khalifa Port in Abu Dhabi as the base of its Middle East operations.
Everybody in the world, except the Americans, seems to understand that bilateral trade builds and strengthens bilateral relations. Disrupt trade and those relations start to drift.
Missed opportunity
CRRC is the company, I reported more than three years ago, that set up assembly facilities outside of Chicago and Boston to replace outdated subway cars with new, state-of-the-art cars at a cost 20% lower than competitive bids and containing more than 60% made-in-America content.
The first delivery was met with rave reviews and praise as an outstanding case of win-win success. Thus encouraged, the Chinese company started to make plans to study the feasibility of replacing the subway cars in New York and Washington, DC.
That was when the wise old folks in Congress, such as the Senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer, put a kibosh on the process. Senator Schumer raised the alarm that subway cars are perfect for Beijing to use for spying on the American commuters.
Thus, today New Yorkers continue to ride on the noisy, dilapidated, rocking and rolling, more than century-old subway cars, secure in knowing that no one is going to spy on them. By golly.
At this point, all Washington seems to know is to take cheap shots at China, denigrate beneficial projects around the world, and obstruct China’s progress wherever possible. The rest of the world is increasingly skeptical and unsure that following the US is in their best interest.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-83264517009234248412022-10-09T16:00:00.006-07:002022-10-09T16:00:46.420-07:00US pushes ‘rule-based disorder’ Latest set of sanctions targeting the chip industry will do no one any good, certainly not the US itselfFirst posted in <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/10/us-pushes-rule-based-disorder/">Asia Times</a>.
Upon becoming president of the United States, Joe Biden immediately set forth to promote “rule-based international order,” ostensibly for the world community, but the message was really intended for China. The “world order,” according to Biden, was for Beijing to conduct its foreign affairs in line with Washington’s expectations.
Now into the second year of his regime, it has become increasingly clear that Biden’s idea of order is actually disorder and is causing chaos not only in the world but especially to the American economy.
The latest example is the most recent series of sanctions and embargoes forbidding sales of semiconductor chips and manufacturing equipment to China.
Up to now, China has been far and away the largest buyer for semiconductor processing equipment and is the major market for advanced chips designed by such Silicon Valley companies as Nvidia and made by such foundries as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
The ban seeks all the members of the semiconductor industry, foreign and domestic, to go cold turkey and stop doing business with China.
Heretofore, the industry has been a prime example of a virtuous circle created by globalization. In simplified terms, we can say that innovations in chip designs for new uses are created in Silicon Valley, fabricated by foundries in Taiwan and South Korea, and then shipped to China to assemble into devices and final products, which are then sold around the world.
Companies engaged in making fabrication and processing equipment kept pushing the boundaries of their technology and collaborated with the foundries to produce the next generation of advanced chips. The equipment companies were not just in the US but also in Japan and the Netherlands.
Everyone wins in a virtuous circle
In a virtuous circle, everybody does what he does best and contributes to a supply chain at the most cost-effective efficiency. Everybody wins in such a circle.
By breaking up the circle, everybody loses. South Korean foundries such as Samsung sell 40% of their output to China, including foundries they operate inside China.
China represents around 30% of sales for semiconductor fabrication equipment from American companies such as Applied Materials and Lam Research.
China is also the most important market for ASML, the Netherlands-based company that is in essence the only maker of advanced lithographic machines. Despite the just-imposed ban, the company has continued to increase its local hire in China to support its sales and technical services.
Every member of the circle now faces a perplexing dilemma: Do they obey the Washington edict at the expense of their financial interests and companies’ futures? Or do they pay a lot of money to lawyers and lobbyists to plead on their behalf and secure certain dispensations that would allow their continuing to do business with China, perhaps at a more subdued level?
Or do they find questionable routes and intermediaries to continue their sales to China? Or can they flat out defy Washington?
In theory, their lost sales to China would be replaced by the expansion of a new and growing US market, as foreign companies such as TSMC and Samsung are enticed or coerced into building new fabs in the US.
The challenge is whether other members of the circle can survive long enough while waiting for the new capacities in America to make up the immediate shortfall around the world. Furthermore, there are serious concerns and doubts as to whether new fabs could actually happen in the US.
The cost of defying Washington’s order will be high, but the industry can already see that the cost of yielding to Biden’s sanctions makes no sense given the devastating consequences.
TSMC obediently gave up on serving Huawei, its most important customer, under orders from Donald Trump’s White House more than two years ago. Now it apparently has given up on the rest of the China market in exchange for locating fabs in the US. Since then, the market capitalization of the company has declined by half from its peak.
Washington offers losing propositions
Washington doesn’t offer any incentives or rewards, just threats and intimidation if they are not obeyed. This is what a hegemon does, but increasingly the world is disenchanted and not convinced
South Korea is the latest to feel the sting that goes with being a loyal American ally. Washington expected the Koreans to give up their huge markets in China, and the reward was for their president to face a rude and very public brushoff when he greeted Biden at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York recently.
According to K J Noh, who understands the Korean language, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol cursed in the foulest terms at the way he was treated. Hard to blame him though. Biden is asking his country commit economic seppuku but acted like Yoon was some Asian scumbag – another gaffe that the White House staff will have to repair.
The European Union has also learned that there is no upside in being a groupie of American foreign policy. By joining the US in supporting the Ukrainians and sanctioning Russia in the Ukrainian war, the EU is facing a bleak cold winter with a shortfall of fuel to heat homes and fire the boilers that the German industries will need to keep operating.
Facing record-breaking inflation, the people in the EU are becoming restless and beginning to agitate and question the reasons for antagonizing Russia and bringing economic misery on to themselves.
Shortly before the UNGA, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization concluded its annual conference, held in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. Under China’s leadership, the SCO welcomed Iran and Belarus as new members, with a long list of other nations applying to join, including Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and others. The SCO now accounts for half of the world’s population and more than 25% of global GDP.
Non-aligned countries find the SCO increasingly attractive as an antidote to American unilateralism. Geopolitical rivals such as India and Pakistan or Saudi Arabia and Iran can leave their contentions outside and join the organization to work on trade and economic cooperation, and collaborate on combating terrorism.
Unlike the American led groups of nations, political or military alliances are specifically excluded within the SCO. There are, by the way, no nations waiting to join the US alliance to contain China.
As I observed in June, the US approach to recruiting others to join in an alliance to contain China is a faltering strategy that will lead to America’s self-destruction. Biden’s insistence on decoupling China from the semiconductor supply chain is another step in that direction.
Another step to self-destruction
Washington seems not to have anticipated China’s likely response to the latest sanctions. Its semiconductor industry is redoubling its efforts and investments to develop technical advances that would replace the chips and fab equipment that have been cut off by the American sanctions.
China has the raw technical manpower graduating from their colleges and universities every year and has recruited senior engineers and fabrication technologists – Asia Times called them godfathers – from Taiwan, Japan and South Korea to advise on the technical and management direction.
News from China already indicates that they are making breakthroughs getting around the American embargoes. Even American analysts say that the trade barriers are doomed to fail. In the long run, the Biden sanctions will help China create its own independent semiconductor industry and leave the currently established providers out in the cold.
When and if China decides to retaliate in full, it has the wherewithal to inflict pain in kind. China’s CATL is the world’s largest producer of lithium batteries for electric vehicles. The company has announced plans to build a US$7 billion plant in Hungary to serve European automakers. Its plans for North America are on hold since Nancy Pelosi’s jaunt to Taipei.
China also has a virtual stranglehold on the world supply of rare earth minerals, some crucial in strategic military applications, and can elect to restrict sales to the US. Most recently, the Pentagon was aghast to find that the engine of the F-35 fighter depends on rare-earth magnets made in China.
This latest “discovery” shows the deep integration of the two major economies and the difficulty of disentangling and decoupling the two. It also can show the destructive power of paranoia in Washington.
The wise old gnomes in the bowels of the Pentagon probably wouldn’t suggest tearing apart all the existing F-35s to remove the magnets from China, but could certainly see this matter as another “urgent” reason to increase the defense budget greatly in order to develop a domestic replacement.
The hostile drumbeats from Washington reverberate within the echo chamber for the benefit of the handful of allies sitting inside, seemingly unaware of the ongoing peaceful cooperation between China and the rest of the world.
It’s hard to know when the American people will say enough is enough and vote for a thorough reform of how Washington makes friends instead of enemies.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-14996193379832513412022-08-27T18:25:00.001-07:002022-08-27T18:25:24.321-07:00My confession seems to have struck a responsive chordI also had a conversation with <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc43oYpZShA">Cyrus Janssen</a> on his YouTube channel.
I have received many more reader responses than usual on my essay on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/08/confessions-of-a-disgruntled-chinese-american/">Asia Times</a>. I have decided to post selected inputs from my readers.
Ifay Chang
Tue, Aug 23, 9:17 AM (1 day ago)
I echo with you as a Republican, seeing the hypocritic bipartisan bickering that is degrading the U.S.. Ifay
Bob Dickerson
Tue, Aug 23, 9:29 AM (1 day ago)
Wonderful, George. Very moving and so honest. Peace and love to you. If you need me, I’ll be there for you.
Peter Li
Tue, Aug 23, 9:42 AM (1 day ago)
Thanks George. You have said exactly what’s in my heart and a sense of frustration and exasperation. America has changed so much since we first came in the 40s and 50s. Alas…
Peter
William Fuller
Tue, Aug 23, 9:51 AM (1 day ago)
Hi George,
From one 84 year old to another, well done! Like you, I could not be more worried about our country, its relations with China, and the risks to our democracy.
With best wishes,
Bill
Ivy Chang
Tue, Aug 23, 9:58 AM (1 day ago)
George,
I'm an immigrant, like you, and agree with your writing. You make the Chinese in the U.S. proud.
Lillian Sing
Tue, Aug 23, 10:39 AM (1 day ago)
George,
I tilt my hat to you over and over again. Once again, your writing touched my heart and soul. 很佩服你!
You share the same experience as so many of us, CA, who came to the US with hope and aspiration. Yes, US has been good to us. I became a judge when there were no female AA women judges in No. CA . It was a dream come true. But, alas, I see over and over again, how US has missed opportunities to be the great country and now has taken steps that will endanger all of us. CA is no longer welcome here. We are viewed with suspicious and the entire CA community is accused of posing a "whole of society threat against the US." Like you, I feel betrayed, disappointed and the necessity to speak out.
Lillian
Nancy M. Lee
Tue, Aug 23, 10:47 AM (1 day ago)
George:
I could not have agreed with you more. It echoes precisely my feeling. When I came to this country in 1960, America was at its best. It has since come down and deteriorated year by year. Instead of using the tax money to build our country, it has spent the money around the globe to start wars.
Thank you for writing this excellent article. I am sending your article to all my non-asian friends.
Best,
Nancy
Anthony Ng
Aug 23, 2022, 11:14 AM (1 day ago)
Dear George:
Thank you for sharing. Profound analysis! I resonated so much with what you wrote and got to know you better.
Indeed, honesty is such a lonely word in politics. What could we do as part of the solution? I would love to hear more from you. Could we chat at your convenience?
Blessings,
Anthony C. Ng
Robert Kapp
Tue, Aug 23, 1:12 PM (1 day ago)
I knew we had things in common: I ran "Americans Abroad for McCarthy" in London in 1968, when I was a graduate student just out of nine months of Ph.D. research in Chiang Kai-shek's Taiwan.
But not Laurelhurst: the first thing someone at the UW said to me when we moved to Seattle in 1973 and I joined the UW faculty was, "Of course you'll live in Laurelhurst...." Uh-uh. We bought a houseboat for $12k instead. I never did quite meld with the Laurelhurstians on campus.
Best wishes.
B.
Phil Cunningham
Tue, Aug 23, 1:26 PM (1 day ago)
Hi George,
I liked reading your personal story, helps put your pieces in perspective. You have a lot of wisdom, hard-earn lessons and longitude in your views on things.
Funny on the Shakespeare thing. Cornell Press asked me to read a thesis and book proposal by a Chinese scholar about Shakespeare in China; it was quite good!
I've got a piece coming out in SCMP this week about decline in number of Chinese students, using Cornell as example. Next piece is about the almost complete zeroing out of US students in China.
Phil
Maeley Tom
Aug 23, 2022, 1:57 PM (1 day ago)
Your article was nothing short of "outstanding" and distributing it to my network. Thank you George
mirandahsue@gmail.com
Tue, Aug 23, 2:50 PM (1 day ago)
George
Your disclosure of personal experience is deeply appreciated by myself
And this is a very acceptable article to share with all My friends disregard their political outlook nor their “ distorted “ ( a big majority of them , unfortunately
Views or perception of China
These are fir those who lived in the west ( US Canada England Australia or even Hong Kong and yes HK and Taiwan)
Your personal experience is indisputable including your criticism and disappointment with US politicians ! Money talk it’s not like one would like to think Democracy is Peoples Talk ( we are all damaged by the Western Politician Talk ) leaving many of us feeling so helpless and hopeless 😩
Miranda
Hsiung Fei Lee
Tue, Aug 23, 2:54 PM (1 day ago)
Dear George:
Very well said. Your article of "Confessions of a Disgruntled Chinese American" resonances with me very much. I first came to the US in 1961. The America in the early 60's was different from how or what it is today. Many of the things you mentioned were not on the surface back then. The military and defense industry complex brings misery to the people around the world as well as Americans at home. It is hard to reverse the ' one-dollar-one-vote system' we have today back to the ' one-man-one-vote system' it is supposed to be. But it is the only chance that America will survive another two hundreds years without collapsing. There has to be a way to turn the American policy from outward expansionism to paying attention of domestic issues. Washington needs to look after the well being of the 99% instead of what happens in Ukraine or Taiwan Strait. Most Americans do not understand international politics. Hopefully, they know what it means to have food on the table and the roof over their head.
H. F.
L. Ling-Chi WANG
Tue, Aug 23, 3:48 PM (1 day ago)
Hi, George:
What an inspiring confession!
There are so many striking similarities between your experience and mine, from being born in the same year and raised on the same tiny island of beautiful Gulangyu (鼓浪屿), 3 sq. Km., to coming to America for education and opportunity to becoming engaged in American civic life, and finally, to becoming disillusioned and disgruntled in our sunset years. Reading your confession is like reading my own memoir except you write, as usual, with such flair and eloquence, I could not possibly match.
It is quite incredible that we should finally, in a fortunate stroke of serendipity, meet in San Francisco a few years ago when we were active in the fight to win freedom and justice for Dr. Wen Ho Lee. Dr. Wen Ho Lee won his freedom on September 13, 2000. Sadly and outrageously, 22 years later, we, Chinese Americans today, have all become Wen Ho Lee because of American ignorance, racial prejudice, and hostility.
Thanks for sharing your experience. Keep writing because the U.S. needs your perspective and voice!
Ling-chi
henrystang@aol.com
Aug 23, 2022, 3:58 PM (1 day ago)
With great grandiloquence, par excellence. Henry
Richard King
Tue, Aug 23, 4:40 PM (1 day ago)
Dear George:
Thank you for sharing your story with me. We are the same age. But I came when I was already 14. I did well in school but not at your level. While my math was fine I still struggled with my English and therefore did not get into Bronx Science. Instead I attended Lincoln Park Honor School. I wanted to go to Cornell but did not have the money. I worked at a Jewish resort and managed to save $ 1,100, a nice sum but it was short of the $ 2,000 needed. If I knew then what I know now, I could have borrowed, got a scholarship or worked at a frat house for my room and board. I went to CCNY which was known as poorman's Harvard. At that time more than 90% of the students were Jewish. I hated it. Ironically, my son Bentley would one day go to and graduate from Cornell. Of course he did not have to work a single day to pay for his tuition. But isn't that what we all work for: To give a better life for our kids?
Since there were few of us then, there was not the hysteria of Asian, namely Chinese, students taking over the top colleges. Affirmative actions were then not that evident. These days I don't know what it would take for our kids and grandchildren to get into an Ivy or MIT?
China was then Red China and for the most part not on the radar screen. Even as recent as the late 70s and early 80s it was Japan that was the threat. Japan bashing was in full swing. Japan folded and has never recovered. China is a different and more tough nut to crack. As you pointed out, the head of the FBI shamelessly bragged about targeting ethnic Chinese. I worked in the defense industry, something I would not do today. I wonder what would happen if all ethnic Chinese were to boycott the defense industry. It would collapse.
With China's rising, we Chinese-Americans will increasingly face tough times ahead.
Richard
James Hsue
Tue, Aug 23, 5:34 PM (1 day ago)
Thank you George for the personal experience spoken from the heart. It is an experience that is probably widely shared amongst not only Chinese Americans but also amongst Chinese canadians, Chinese Australians etc. I am really happy to see it being told. I sent it out to my HK highschool classmates, many of whom emigrated to the U.S., Canada and the U.K.
James
Shirley Kinoshita
6:51 AM (16 hours ago)
George
Interesting op-ed. I also served on the Santa Clara County Human Relations Commission and has experienced a lot of opportunities and rewards as an American. In my case, I’ve had the added blessing of being born in US Territory of Hawaiii, see my home state become a state. I’m surprised you use the term “Heaven..” since I believe you are not a believer in this concept.
Shirley
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1793669946906507976.post-36847057584004395842022-08-24T22:19:00.004-07:002022-08-24T22:19:55.102-07:00Confessions of a disgruntled Chinese-American. Heaven help any aspiring leader who wants to correct America’s problems at home and campaign on what the US needs to fix.First posted on <a href="https://asiatimes.com/2022/08/confessions-of-a-disgruntled-chinese-american/">Asia Times</a>.
I am proud to be an 84-year-old Chinese-American: proud of my Chinese heritage and at one time proud to be an American. My friends frequently ask me why I am so critical of our government. I tell them that as a citizen, I have a right and duty to criticize when I see my country heading in the wrong direction.
It has not always been like this. One of my proudest moments was when I became a naturalized citizen many years ago. To be an American was something to be proud of and look forward to. I thought I was enjoying a charmed life and living in the best of two worlds.
Before I immigrated to America, I lived in China for my first 11 years, a country devastated by war with Japan. But I had the good fortune of living in a remote area of China that never saw one Japanese soldier. Thus I didn’t have to witness the many unspeakable acts of atrocity committed by the Japanese military.
When my mom, my sisters and I joined my dad in Seattle, he was a graduate student on a very limited income. We lived in the university housing project where each duplex was modestly better than a Quonset hut. But we lived within the district of one of the best elementary schools in town.
At Laurelhurst Elementary, my classmates, mostly from well-to-do families, helped me learn English as quickly as I could absorb it. A friend gave me helmet and shoulder pads and I quickly learned to play football. At no time did I feel the sting of racism. My welcome to America was all cookies and cream.
I graduated at the top of my senior class and received a scholarship and part-time job on campus to attend the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. By the time I became a young father raising a family in New Jersey, I was the supervisor of a materials-testing laboratory. My company encouraged me to complete my doctoral studies by giving me leave and financial support.
I was living my American dream. I even participated in exercising American democracy by becoming a grassroots worker campaigning for delegates going to the Democratic National Convention to cast their votes for Eugene McCarthy as the party’s presidential nominee.
But watching the 1968 Chicago convention on national TV, I was appalled and outraged. Mayor Richard Daley’s police force was supposed to maintain law and order. Instead, they were instigators of violence and chaos, clubbing the protesters outside the convention.
I wrote a letter to the Newark Evening News, a major daily in New Jersey, expressing my indignation. To my surprise, my letter was published. That encouragement caused me to think that expressing my opinion could make a difference.
After I moved my family to California, I continued to participate in civic affairs and local politics. I was the campaign manager for two friends running for the city council – at different times. One won and the other did not.
When my city decided to establish a “Human Relations Commission,” I was appointed to the first one. One of my commendations read: “His service demonstrates his commitment to the community and the desire to promote the fullest participation of all members of the community.”
When Mike Honda decided to run for Congress and asked for my help, I was happy to help because he was an honorable and genuine human being with a generous heart.
He won on his first try and when we met for lunch to celebrate, he told me that his first task at hand was to raise a lot of money for his campaign war chest so that potential opponents would think twice about running to unseat him. His revelation surprised me but also drove home to me the realization that money had taken control of our democracy.
Fast-forward to today, and I keep asking myself, “Why has my country fallen so low?” We can’t seem to keep up with other developed countries that are our peers.
We unfailingly acknowledge the importance of education as critical to the future of our children, but we only talk and don’t do anything about it. The quality of education depends on the average household income in the local area where the school is located. Children from the city ghettoes hardly ever get a decent education and thus start out in life with a disadvantage that many are not equipped to overcome.
In some parts of our country teaching creationism has the same legitimacy as teaching science and mathematics. Some Americans still believe that our Earth is 6,000 years old. Ignorance is regarded as a badge of honor.
<b>Thou shalt not commit perjury</b>
“Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?” I may have learned the oath from the long-running TV serial Perry Mason, but I came to understand that honesty and being truthful were among the foundational principles that made America great.
Today, public figures of any and all stripes tell lies and do not even bat an eyelash. They violate every statute of the constitution as if the laws of the land do not apply to them. There is no sense of honor and right or wrong or even any hint of shame.
Our two major political parties battle for control of the federal government and Congress. They devote virtually all of their energy and attention to outmaneuvering the other side just to gain an edge. Getting re-elected and retaining their seats in Congress have highest priority unless it’s to unseat someone from the other party. Pettiness reigns and national interest is rarely on the table.
My e-mail inbox is filled daily with solicitations from candidates running for public office asking me for a campaign contribution. People I have never heard of, running for the House or Senate or governor from a state far from California, and they don’t ever ask what issues I support. They simply presume that I care about their getting elected.
They just want my money. If I can write a big check, they will come running again and again. If I don’t write checks but can “bundle” a lot of checks from other contributors into a bagful, I will be regarded as a person of influence. America’s democracy is all about money and it takes more and more to enter the fray. Thoughtful and capable politicians are getting out.
Our roads and bridges are dilapidated, college and university tuition has been rising beyond most household budgets, women are denied the right to decide what’s good for their health, and schoolchildren are regularly slaughtered in mass shootings. These are just a few indicators of what’s wrong with America.
Heaven help any aspiring leader who wants to correct the problems at home and campaign on what America needs to fix. Such a candidate won’t get financial sponsors and won’t get nominated, much less win any election. Incumbents will not risk their chances of re-election by tackling these knotty issues and are very adept at kicking the can down the road.
<b>Anti-China chorus</b>
The one sure-fire way to political success is to demonize China and attack China as our adversary, an easy adversary accepted by both parties. In the process, every ethnic Asian in America becomes a prospective target of hate crime, because “all Asians look alike.”
To add fuel to the fire, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation even boasted about the many cases of investigation opened daily on Chinese-Americans employed in American universities and research organizations.
He never talks about the disproportionate number of cases that were dismissed or dropped because of lack of evidence or the FBI’s haste to accuse. He doesn’t acknowledge the financial ruin suffered by the innocent victims because of the cost of their legal defense and their having to deal with careers in tatters.
A senator from Arkansas even suggested that students from China should not be allowed to come to the US for further studies in science and engineering but only on Shakespeare.
Indeed, because of arbitrary prosecutions, random violence from hate crimes and uncertain treatment on granting of visas, enrollment from China has already dropped substantially. There is nothing to suggest that this trend is likely to reverse.
Heretofore, Chinese-Americans have contributed far more than their pro rata would indicate. They come to America as part of China’s cream of the crop, already well trained and prepared to contribute with diligence and motivation. If they stop coming, it will be America’s loss.
Meanwhile, Washington is investing all its energy on pushing China’s head under water, all the while not doing anything to solve the social and economic ills rooted within our country. China will continue to work around the American embargoes and sanctions and surpass the US with one technological advance after another.
It already has taken the lead in many technical disciplines, Shakespearean scholarship not being among them.
Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13997598378471957487noreply@blogger.com0